Commons:Quality images candidates

Shortcut

• COM:QIC

↓ Skip to nominations ↓

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.

Purpose

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

Guidelines

All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.

For nominators

Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.

Image page requirements

1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
3. Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
4. No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.

Creator

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technical requirements

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolution

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Image quality

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Composition and lighting

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Value

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

How to nominate

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Number of nominations

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Evaluating images

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

How to review

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

• If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

• If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Grace period and promotion

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

How to execute decision

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)

If promoted,

1. Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
2. Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
3. Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 2023.
4. Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

1. move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 2023.

• Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
• Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
• Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 23 2023 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 08:23, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

• Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
• Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
• Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
• If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

Please nominate no more than 5 images per day.

February 23, 2023

• 

  • Nomination: Houses, Rue du Touquet 27 to 21, in Marquette-lez-Lille, France --Velvet 07:51, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Row of houses, Rue Claude Debussy 12 to 2, in Marquette-lez-Lille, France --Velvet 07:50, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Cross at El Peñón del Fraile, Puerto de la Cruz --Mike Peel 07:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Cross at El Peñón del Fraile, Puerto de la Cruz --Mike Peel 07:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Mosaic of the Canary Islands at Puerto de la Cruz --Mike Peel 07:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    The artist's name is blurred. Fixable? --Tagooty 08:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Aechmea fasciata at Jardín de Aclimatación de La Orotava --Mike Peel 07:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Aechmea fasciata at Jardín de Aclimatación de La Orotava --Mike Peel 07:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Seed fluffs of the large ones formed by weather and wind Typha latifolia on the water side. Location, The Famberhorst. Focus stack of 14 photos.
    --Famberhorst 06:42, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Shell of a Lamarck's Frog Snail, Bursa lamarckii --Llez 06:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:46, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Portrait de François Artaud, le premier conservateur du Musée Saint-Pierre à Lyon. --Benoît Prieur 06:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:47, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bridge at Waltensburg/Vuorz railway station view of the Vorderrhein--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Waltensburg/Vuorz. View from the road next to the Voor-Rijn at Waltensburg/Vuorz railway station to Schiessstand Pardiala.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:50, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Chapel Sogn Carli. View (from Kapelle Sogn Carli) on the clouds above themountains on the south side of the valley.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Saint Stephen church in Villebret, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 05:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Town hall of Durdat-Larequille, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 05:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bell tower of the St Martial church in Durdat, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 05:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Our Lady church in Larequille, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 05:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Tower of the town hall of Néris-les-Bains, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 05:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Jewish cemetery in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:04, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Jewish cemetery in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Trail through the Aesbachtal in Berdorf, Luxembourg --XRay 04:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination St Michael’s Chapel Ruin Braunton, Devon, United Kingdom --XRay 04:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:04, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Jewish cemetery in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Plaque on Glorietteweg in Leonstein, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Fingerposts on Glorietteweg in Leonstein, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Coarse woody debris at the forest track Gloriettenweg in Leonstein, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Eastern part of the forest track Gloriettenweg in Leonstein, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bench at the autumnal forest trail "Gloriettenweg" in Leonstein, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Ring-Billed Gull --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination HTO Park --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Fairmont Le Château Frontenac --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Black Drongo --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Canada Goose --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Double-decker SMRT bus, route 972, Bukit Panjang, Singapore --Tagooty 01:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Entrance, National Orchid Garden, Botanic Gardens, Singapore --Tagooty 01:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Info board (map), Bukit Timah Nature Reserve, Singapore --Tagooty 01:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Info board (rules), Bukit Timah Nature Reserve, Singapore --Tagooty 01:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Elevated LRT track and housing blocks near Bukit Panjang, Singapore --Tagooty 01:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

February 22, 2023

• 

  • Nomination Black-capped Chickadee --Cephas 23:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Hairy Woodpecker, female, feeding on fat --Cephas 22:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination American Red Squirrel --Cephas 22:56, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Straps of the 415 series train used on Honshu - Kyushu route. By User:Ka23 13 --Augustgeyler 21:43, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Steam train operated by Preßnitztalbahn at Schmalzgrube station. By User:Kora27 --Augustgeyler 21:43, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Mouse, partially eaten by a house cat in Roly, Belgium --Trougnouf 21:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Buildings west of Bellevue Square at en:Saint-Étienne. --Touam 20:46, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Rural landscape in the French department of Ardèche. --Cayambe 18:54, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:55, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Water tower in Leipzig-Engelsdorf with ploughed field in the foreground. --Augustgeyler 17:48, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:55, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Honda HR-V Hybrid in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 17:45, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Skoda Kodiaq in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 17:45, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 19:42, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Volkswagen Taigo in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 17:45, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination The statue for Joachim II. in front of the church St. Nikolai in Berlin-Spandau --FlocciNivis 17:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline People are spoiling the composition and the bottom crop is not wel done --Michielverbeek 21:10, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination The wayside cross from the year 1863 in front of a framer's house in Kutzhof-Numborn --FlocciNivis 17:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:57, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: A wall in Luisenthal, district of Völklingen --FlocciNivis 17:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: A railway bridge of the former railway line Völklingen-Heidstock–Püttlingen mine --FlocciNivis 17:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
     Comment Very good image. I ask you to specify where exactly this bridge is. You could ad a geocode by using the template object location. --Augustgeyler 17:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
    It is inside the Stadtwald Völklingen, as specified in the file description and cats. I think it is at the coordinates 49.26358°N 6.87913°E / 49.26358; 6.87913, but I'm not completely sure, could also be a bit more to the south. --FlocciNivis 18:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
     Comment Is this the only bridge of that kind in that park? If not, I suggest adding this to the image with a parameter "prec:100" --Augustgeyler 18:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination The tower of the church St. Margareta in Forst with a vineyard in front of it --FlocciNivis 17:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 17:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Français : Les petits Piémontais, peinture visible au Musée Municipal de Bourg-en--Bresse. XIXe siècle. Oeuvre primée au Salon de 1842.Français : Les petits Piémontais, peinture visible au Musée Municipal de Bourg-en--Bresse. XIXe siècle. Oeuvre primée au Salon de 1842. --Benoît Prieur 15:42, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination MG4 EV at Automesse Ludwigsburg 2022.--Alexander-93 15:38, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 19:43, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination MG5 EV at Automesse Ludwigsburg 2022.--Alexander-93 15:38, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 19:43, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Re-routing of railway line ELSt/6375 in Leipzig. By User:Falk2 --Augustgeyler 15:15, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:57, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Main plaque of the burial ground for 766 war dead of various nations at Ostfriedhof, Leipzig --Augustgeyler 15:15, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Pipe organs of the Holy Trinity Church in Bad Berneck --Ermell 11:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:16, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Emporium paintings in the Protestant branch church in Trumsdorf --Ermell 11:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 19:43, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Emporium paintings in the Protestant branch church in Trumsdorf --Ermell 11:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:16, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Emporium paintings in the Protestant branch church in Trumsdorf --Ermell 11:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Emporium paintings in the Protestant branch church in Trumsdorf --Ermell 11:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:16, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: An aerial view of Cape Byron Lighthouse in Cape Byron SCA, Byron Bay, New South Wales (by Maksym Kozlenko) --SHB2000 11:48, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Vineyard in the French department of Ardèche. --Cayambe 11:16, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro --PetarM 10:48, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Argenberg 12:29, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Sculpture on a grave at Waldfriedhof München --Kritzolina 10:31, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Crocus at Munich Waldfriedhof --Kritzolina 10:31, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Argenberg 12:31, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Burial chapel of the family Krone on the Munich Waldfriedhof (No. 13-W-1) - Interior --Kritzolina 10:31, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Grave of Helga Martin at Waldfriedhof Munich --Kritzolina 10:31, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:29, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Grave of Hildegard Hamm-Brücher at Munich Waldfriedhof (No. 88-W-42) --Kritzolina 10:31, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:16, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Pyramids of Güímar --Mike Peel 08:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Pyramids of Güímar --Mike Peel 08:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Pyramids of Güímar --Mike Peel 08:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Pyramids of Güímar --Mike Peel 08:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 11:18, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Pyramids of Güímar --Mike Peel 08:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Trevi fountain, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 07:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Trevi fountain, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 07:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Trevi fountain, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 07:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Trevi fountain, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 07:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Trevi fountain, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 07:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 11:46, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Row of houses, rue Emile Dellette 42 to 52, in Wasquehal, France --Velvet 07:10, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 11:44, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Roundabout, Rue Emile Dellette, in Wasquehal, France --Velvet 07:09, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support An additional cat about the wooden structure would be good (I have no clue what that is called), but good to go --Poco a poco 07:56, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Shell of a Spinose cerith, Cerithium echinatum --Llez 06:41, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:56, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Laccaria laccata the deceiver, or waxy laccaria.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Crepidotus mollis peeling oysterling.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Xylaria hypoxylon.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Stained-glass window in the Saint Genesius of Rome church in Saint-Genest, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 05:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Saint Thomas church in La Petite-Marche, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 05:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Saint Julian church in Saint-Fargeol, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 05:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Saint Marcellus church in Saint-Marcel-en-Marcillat, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 05:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Saint Martin church in Terjat, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 05:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Paddy fields in Ubud, Bali, Indonesia --Jakubhal 05:02, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Gravestone “Benjamin Wolff” at the Jewish cemetery in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:03, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Jewish cemetery in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Jewish cemetery in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:03, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bunker 21 in the ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Stalk of an orange --XRay 04:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Kindergarten on Kirchweg #5, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:35, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Elementary and music school on Kirchplatz #6, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:35, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Villa on Moosburger Straße #21, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Villa «Kärntner Hof» on Moosburger Straße #25, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:21, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Club house at the tennis venue on Leonsteinerstraße #15, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:21, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Ring-Billed Gull --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please adjust the perspective. "Toronto" as location is not good enough. A smart crop would be nice, there is too much empty space. Geo location is missing. --XRay 04:44, 22 February 2023 (UTC)@XRay: Thanks for your review, perspective fixed, location category fixed, cropped. I'm not sure how to add geo, is it already built-in camera? I couldn't find such settings. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 16:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Ring-Billed Gull --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Ring-Billed Gull --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:21, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Norvic 1 --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please adjust the perspective. A category for the location is missing. Geo location is missing. It looks like a snapshot. --XRay 04:46, 22 February 2023 (UTC)@XRay: Thanks for your review. Fixed the perspective and the category for the location, not sure about the geo location. I decreased the aperture from 1.8 to 4 to capture good details of white parts, also good enough shutter speed for a sharp image, I think the objects behind the boat are too close for a strong bokeh--Fabian Roudra Baroi 16:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Lornie Trail marker, MacRitchie Park, Singapore --Tagooty 01:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:35, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Sign, Springleaf Prata Place, Rail Mall, Upper Bt Timah Road, Singapore --Tagooty 01:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Upper Bukit Timah Road, south bound near the Summit, Singapore --Tagooty 01:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Info board, Battle of Bukit Timah, Bukit Timah Nature Reserve, Singapore --Tagooty 01:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:35, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Rain vortex at night, Jewel Changi Airport, Singapore --Tagooty 01:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

February 21, 2023

• 

  • Nomination Jeune fille au panier de fleurs (Michel Philibert Genod) Musée de Brou (février 2023). --Benoît Prieur 22:08, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: L'Adoration des Bergers (Aertgen van Leyden) Musée de Brou (février 2023). --Benoît Prieur 21:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Volcan de Tagoro departing from the port of Santa Cruz de Tenerife, with a rainbow in the background --Mike Peel 18:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Horizon appears tilted CW --Tagooty 03:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Volcan de Tagoro departing from the port of Santa Cruz de Tenerife, with a rainbow in the background --Mike Peel 18:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:16, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Avenida de Anaga, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, with a rainbow in the background --Mike Peel 18:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:16, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Teleconferencing booth --Mike Peel 18:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Barranco de Santos in Finca España, Tenerife, with water flowing during the winter. --Mike Peel 18:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Cathedral, Arezzo, Italy --Poco a poco 16:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Looks kind of crooked. The vericals on the right side are not right. The top and right side of the image is quite blurry. --Ermell 20:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
    Yes, looks akward,  new version --Poco a poco 20:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Florence Cathedral, Italy --Poco a poco 16:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Forum Romanum, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 16:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:58, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Forum Romanum, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 16:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:58, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Forum Romanum, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 16:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Airport crash tender at Airport Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 16:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:17, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination 9H-AMK aircraft at Airport Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 16:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Paddy fields in Ubud, Bali, Indonesia --Jakubhal 16:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 20:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Paddy fields in Ubud, Bali, Indonesia --Jakubhal 16:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Paddy fields in Ubud, Bali, Indonesia --Jakubhal 16:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:46, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Paddy fields in Ubud, Bali, Indonesia --Jakubhal 16:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Paddy fields in Ubud, Bali, Indonesia --Jakubhal 16:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Aston Martin DBX in Filderstadt.--Alexander-93 16:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Ford Bronco Sport in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 16:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Suzuki SX4 in Ostfildern.--Alexander-93 16:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:21, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: View of Piriapólis from San Antonio hill, Uruguay --Ezarate 16:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Row of buildings in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination View of Rekkenze square in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Intersection of two streets in Hof-Bahnhofsviertel, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Inscription on a stone cross as tombstone at Waldfriedhof Munich "Amen" --Kritzolina 14:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Inscription at Waldfriedhof Munich on the grave of Hildegard Hamm-Brücher: "Gott legt uns eine Last auf, aber er hilft uns auch" / "God puts a burden on us, but he is also helping us" --Kritzolina 14:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Inscription at Waldfriedhof Munich - decoration on a grave. Inside one of the angels the inscription reads "Alles vergängliche" / "Everything ephemeral" in the other "ist nur ein Gleichnis" / "is only a parable". --Kritzolina 14:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 18:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Wheelbarrows to loan at Waldfriedhof München --Kritzolina 14:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Wheelbarrows to loan at Waldfriedhof München --Kritzolina 14:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination A row of buildings in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz G 500 4×4² In Frankfurt-Bahnhofsviertel --MB-one 11:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Wooden sculpture "Crane egg" in Saal, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern --MB-one 11:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Bicycles retrieved from the bottom of the river Main in Frankfurt --MB-one 11:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    The sky looks blown out. --Der Angemeldete 12:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Water tower and fuel tanks during Harmattan at Kotoka International Airport, Greater Accra --MB-one 11:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not enough details on the trees/bushes --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: View from the other side of the street to the house at the Elisabethstraße 44 in Munich --FlocciNivis 11:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment very slightly tilted CCW. Otherwise good.--MB-one 11:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination View from the other side of the street to the house at the Elisabethstraße 38 in Munich --FlocciNivis 11:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination View across the Burgstraße to the former inn Zum Engel and the Gate Iller --FlocciNivis 11:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: View to the platforms of the train station Apach with a pedestrian bridge --FlocciNivis 11:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination View to the Saar bridge of Mettlach --FlocciNivis 11:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Emporium paintings in the Protestant branch church in Trumsdorf --Ermell 10:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Tree gnawed by beaver --Ermell 10:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Tree gnawed by beaver --Ermell 10:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Tree gnawed by beaver --Ermell 10:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Knocker on a door in Nice --Ermell 10:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Houses in la Moutte, commune of Viviers-sur-Rhône , France. --Cayambe 08:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination eggs of coal tit - Oeufs de Mésange noire --Ercé 08:11, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 

  • Nomination University campus in Lyon: Charles-Darwin building and tram stop. --Cayambe 07:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Left valve of an oyster, Ostrea stentina var. syriaca --Llez 07:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Junction of the canalized river Marque and the Canal de Roubaix, in Wasquehal, France --Velvet 06:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination The Plomeux lock, on the Canal de Roubaix, in Wasquehal, France --Velvet 06:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:27, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Remnant of one Scleroderma citrinum in beautiful earthy colors between fallen leaves. Location, De Famberhorst. Focus stack of 22 photos.
    --Famberhorst 05:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Stained-glass window in the Saint Martin church in Hyds, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 05:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bell tower of the Saint Maurice church in Blomard, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 05:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Town hall of Beaune-d'Allier, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 05:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Town hall of Malicorne, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 05:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Saint Christopher church in Ronnet, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 05:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Breil-Brigels. Rapids in mountain stream Flem.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Burg Kropfenstein (Casti Grotta)--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Burg Kropfenstein (Casti Grotta
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 05:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Motorized Ultralight (ULM) 'CORMORÁN'. --Rjcastillo 05:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Info board, Rain tree (Samanea saman), Bt Timah, Singapore --Tagooty 04:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Info board, MacRitchie Reservoir, Singapore --Tagooty 04:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Ring-Billed Gull --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination HTO Park --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Clock Tower of old Post Office --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Lake and Andes mountains from Chili. By User:Ram samudrala --Augustgeyler 00:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Stairway with passenger lift under construction at Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf halt --Augustgeyler 00:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline Sharpness could be better. Sorry. --Aciarium 20:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

February 20, 2023

• 

  • Nomination Lecture hall "Elektrotechnik" at the Montanuniversität Leoben--Aciarium 22:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: 20 Fenchurch Street from The Garden at 120. --Kallerna 19:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
     Oppose Overexposure on hole left side. --Der Angemeldete 21:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
    Overexposed on the left side, can you fix it? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Fence at Biddulph Town Hall designed for the Golden Jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II --Mike Peel 17:54, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
    man...this sheep net in the background...but ok, don't want to ruin the promotion here --Der Angemeldete 12:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Building in Pompeo Magno 10, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 16:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Woman at work in a color bath for batik Dambulla, Sri Lanka---Pierre André Leclercq 15:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Woman at work in a color bath for batik Dambulla, Sri Lanka---Pierre André Leclercq 15:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Woman at work in a color bath for batik Dambulla, Sri Lanka--Pierre André Leclercq 15:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Karst landscape of the Cheow Lan Lake, Thailand. --Argenberg 14:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Sunrises of Saxony. By User:Azeraven --IamMM 14:21, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Very nice, but there is some vignetting, --Poco a poco 17:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
    yes, can just somebody brighten the left upper corner. I can't do this myself in the moment and like to suggest this one for Featured Picture. --Der Angemeldete 12:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
     Done but now I cannot promote it on my own. --Poco a poco 17:11, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
     Support Thank you, indeed, you can. But if you do, you have to deal with my intrusive support. --Der Angemeldete 20:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Marina Palace or Presidency of the Republic of Benin --Adoscam 13:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Marina Palace or Presidency of the Republic of Benin --Adoscam 13:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    This image needs to be rotated cw. Additionally the level of detail is borderline. --Augustgeyler 15:44, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Red-stemmed chard (Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris) --Augustgeyler 12:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Low level view of grass verge with heavy frost. By User:Shieladixon --Augustgeyler 12:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Was it intented to park the car the background? --Der Angemeldete 20:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
     Comment I think the author was intending the composition as seen here. --Augustgeyler 09:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Hamburg town hall. By User:Ralf Roletschek --Augustgeyler 12:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: The largest seaworthy model ship in the world “Bremen IV“ at the Technik Museum Speyer
    --F. Riedelio 09:44, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination GMS Europa in the MD Canal --Ermell 09:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Unfortunately, your images do not match the ship images in Category:Europa (ship, 1953, Vlissingen). Also, there appears to be some confusion in the data records for this ship at different forums. The name “Europa” and ENI number “04400500” are marked on the hull, along with the current owner – “JDK ShipService”. --GRDN711 17:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Ship is now correctly categorized. --GRDN711 00:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Fountain with bench and relief at the Brettermark--Cayambe 08:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)t 2 in Lindau am Bodensee --FlocciNivis 08:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 15:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: The villa Salm in Sulzbach/Saar --FlocciNivis 08:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Vallombrosa Abbey seen from Paradisino. --PROPOLI87 08:07, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed

February 19, 2023

• 

  • Nomination: Grandes armes du prince Louis de Bourbon (« Louis XX »), héritier du trône de France, par Louis de Lauban, Grenadin07 22:16, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Dead olive tree near reservoir, region Lagos, Portugal. --NorbertNagel 22:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please add proper categories. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC) Done --NorbertNagel 18:21, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Ancient ruins in Galaxidi. --C messier 20:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Can you lighten the shadows a bit. --Ermell 09:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Braunschweiger Schoduvel 2023 in AltstadtmarkI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Stratokumulus 18:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Mauvais cadrage, Grenadin07 01:33, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Braunschweiger Schoduvel 2023 in AltstadtmarkI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Stratokumulus 18:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Mauvais cadrage, Grenadin07 01:33, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Braunschweiger Schoduvel 2023 in AltstadtmarkI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Stratokumulus 18:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Braunschweiger Schoduvel 2023 in AltstadtmarkI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Stratokumulus 18:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Braunschweiger Schoduvel 2023 in AltstadtmarkI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Stratokumulus 18:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Mauvais cadrage, Grenadin07 01:33, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination The colors are used to guide patients in the Centre Hospitalier Privé de la Loire (CHPL) in en:Saint-Étienne. --Touam 18:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 15:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Fishermen in Trinquemalay, Sri Lanka.--Pierre André Leclercq 17:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Fishermen in Trinquemalay, Sri Lanka.--Pierre André Leclercq 17:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline Tilted --Yeriho 21:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
     Done tilted correction, Thanks for your advice.--Pierre André Leclercq 10:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Fishermen in Trinquemalay, Sri Lanka.--Pierre André Leclercq 17:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Fishermen in Trinquemalay, Sri Lanka.--Pierre André Leclercq 16:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination View of the northern part of Hof-Unterkotzau, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:52, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Volkswagen Golf VIII GTE in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 16:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:21, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Building no. 2 on Strada D. I. Mendeleev, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Building no. 5 on Strada D. I. Mendeleev, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Building no. 5 on Strada D. I. Mendeleev, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Amur falcon (Falco amurensis) --Moheen 15:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Wait, this is already a QI! --Der Angemeldete 18:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Nijhum Dwip National Park --Moheen 15:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Visible compression, unsharp. --SHB2000 11:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination BYD Atto 3 in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 15:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Mercedes-Benz S-Class in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 15:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: The building at the Kaiserstraße 65 in St. Ingbert --FlocciNivis 10:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: University University in Lyon: Charles-Darwin building. --Cayambe 10:14, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: José Seguiri: Ave Quiromántica --Mike Peel 10:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: José Seguiri: Ave Quiromántica --Mike Peel 10:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: José Seguiri: Ave Quiromántica --Mike Peel 10:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination The emptiness is palpable on this sad day at Noarderleech. (fencing)
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination The emptiness is palpable on this sad day at Noarderleech.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

February 18, 2023

• 

  • Nomination Lille citadelle rempart pointe (by Velvet) --Sebring12Hrs 20:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Aciarium 20:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: View of St. Lawrence River --Fabian Roudra Baroi 18:35, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Macaca sinica at Hindu temple of Murugan Kovil, Bandarawela..--Pierre André Leclercq 17:44, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination East habor Frankfurt --NorbertNagel 18:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment Good, but could you reduce the noise ?. --Rjcastillo 17:54, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
     Done --NorbertNagel 11:54, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
     Support Thanks. --Rjcastillo 06:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Federico Assler: Sin título --Mike Peel 16:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Brighton Pier. --Kallerna 12:44, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Panoramic view of Saltdean. --Kallerna 12:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: A depiction of James the Great on a stained-glass window in the church St. Jakobus in Heusweiler-Kutzhof. --FlocciNivis 12:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed

February 17, 2023

• 

  • Nomination: Sunset in Piriapolis, Uruguay view since Argentino Hotel --Ezarate 23:20, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    There is chromatic aberration at the lampposts. --Augustgeyler 13:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
    done, thanks!!! --Ezarate 17:46, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
     Comment It's still visible. --Augustgeyler 18:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
    done, thanks!!! --Ezarate 00:10, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
     Comment Thank you!. You solved it. I reviewed the image again and came to the conclusion not to promote it. In my eyes grain and composition are borderline. So I'd like to ask other reviewers to promote or decline this nomination. --Augustgeyler 12:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Sailboat Doña Francisca in Port of Piriapolis, Uruguay --Ezarate 23:08, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Sloping horizon (tilt to the right) and visible chromatic aberration, fixable? --F. Riedelio 09:40, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
    done, thanks!! --Ezarate 12:58, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
     Horizon not straightened --F. Riedelio 07:19, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Kapodistriac school of Galaxidi. --C messier 21:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Mostly good, could you reduce the noise (particularly in the sky)? --Mike Peel 22:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Nikos Gourgouris street, Galaxidi. --C messier 21:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Too much interesting shadow in the foreground, I suggest to crop a bunch --Poco a poco 22:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Alfonso Miguel García: Untitled Sculpture --Mike Peel 20:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Castillo de San Felipe, Puerto de la Cruz --Mike Peel 20:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: The Wasserwirtschaftsamt (Water Management Office) in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:39, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Barrel distortion, fixable? --F. Riedelio 09:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Hagia Sophia, Istanbul. --Kallerna 13:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Dust spots here as well. --Ermell 14:30, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
    Thanks, fixed. --Kallerna 18:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
    You did not get them all. --Ermell 22:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
    Can you point them out, can't see any? --Kallerna 09:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
    Done --Ermell 22:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
    Thanks, fixed. --Kallerna 19:41, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Sultan Ahmed Mosque, Istanbul. --Kallerna 13:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Dust spots to remove. --Ermell 14:30, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
    Thanks, fixed. --Kallerna 18:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
    Still some left. --Ermell 22:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
    Can you point them out, can't see any? --Kallerna 09:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
    Done --Ermell 22:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
    Thanks, fixed. --Kallerna 19:41, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Hagia Sophia, Istanbul. --Kallerna 13:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    There's a dust spot on the top right --FlocciNivis 10:39, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
    Thanks, fixed. --Kallerna 19:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality now. --FlocciNivis 13:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: A furrow bee on a usury flower in Unterföhring --FlocciNivis 10:47, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed

February 16, 2023

• 

  • Nomination: Coats of arms on a grave --Romainbehar 19:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Resolution is low and one category is a red link. Please improve the resolution and create the missing category. --XRay 05:31, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Mercedes-Benz C-Class All-Terrain in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 15:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    I think that the lamp reflection spoils this nom --Poco a poco 20:25, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

February 15, 2023

• 

  • Nomination: View of Puerto de la Cruz from El Peñón del Fraile --Mike Peel 20:32, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: L'embouchure de l'Avançon dans le Rhône. --Espandero 19:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: View along a road to a pavilion at the Luxembourg railway station --FlocciNivis 15:56, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    The tree and the post is a distraction --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:54, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination The emptiness is palpable on this sad day at Noarderleech. (fencing)
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination The emptiness is palpable on this sad day at Noarderleech. (Wooden bridge.)
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination The emptiness is palpable on this sad day at Noarderleech.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

February 14, 2023

• 

  • Nomination Open wing Basking activity of Amblypodia anita Hewitson, 1862 - Purple Leaf Blue (Female) --Sandipoutsider 06:45, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 20:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Close wing Basking of Mahathala ameria (Hewitson, 1862) - Falcate Oakblue --Sandipoutsider 06:29, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 20:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Close wing Basking of Spindasis vulcanus (Fabricius, 1775) - Common Silverline --Sandipoutsider 06:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality of the butterfly, but the background has large areas of artifacts. --Aciarium 20:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Mating pair of Neopithecops zalmora (Butler, 1870) - Common Quaker --Sandipoutsider 06:20, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Close wing posture Nectaring of Udaspes folus (Cramer, 1775) - Grass Demon --Sandipoutsider 06:15, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Image is grainy and has artifacts either due to high ISO or over sharpening in post. --Nv8200pa 19:19, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

February 13, 2023

• 

  • Nomination Equestrian statue of Baudouin de Constantinople viewed from Place de Flandre in Mons, Belgium --Trougnouf 17:34, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
    This street spoils a lot. Not sure about the "framing" here, but the statue seems sharp to me. Can you try to crop it? --Der Angemeldete 10:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC). No, it's a contemporary street scene rather than a picture of the statue only. While the statue is sharp it does not make up enough pixels on its own to make a crop work. --Trougnouf 22:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
    Ok, thanks, I suspected such. I'll desist from supporting here. --Der Angemeldete 11:24, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose  Oppose Thinking of the discussion here and taking into account what the image title suggests (the monument), I think this technically correct image can not become QI. --Augustgeyler 12:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Mount Säntis an iconic mountain from Switzerland, seen from Mount Rigi another iconic mountain of Switzerland. We didn't have this view before, at least not categorized. Its my first nomination.Paradise Chronicle 01:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
    Mhm, although it should show the morning light before sunrise the color seems to me a bit faint due to grey haze. Of course white balance would ruin this immediatly but can you try to make the coulors a bit more intense? If the darker parts even become darker then it wouldn't be a loss. --Der Angemeldete 09:41, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review needed

February 12, 2023

• 

  • Nomination: Comet Bradfield. By User:TheStarmon --C messier 19:50, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Is this red beam on the left corner a lense effect or does it belong to the picture? --Der Angemeldete 08:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
    I think is a trail caused by a red light on Earth as the camera tracks the sky. --C messier 20:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
    I see, thanks for clearing this up. Do you mean, it can be removed, since it was not intended to take with the photograph? The object itself is a QI to me. --Der Angemeldete 11:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

February 11, 2023

• 

  • Nomination: Karoussell, Saintes, Frankreich.--NorbertNagel 21:00, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Vignetting, fixable? --F. Riedelio 07:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
     Done Better now? --NorbertNagel 12:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

February 9, 2023

• 

  • Nomination: Rock next to a beach --Romainbehar 11:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Why it is so small? Also, needs a better description. Where is this beach? --C messier 21:14, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Silos at Pisco Mistral Distillery. --Rjcastillo 04:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please add a category for the location. --XRay 04:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
     Done --Rjcastillo 21:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
    What do you think about Category:Pisco Elqui? --XRay 05:27, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
     Comment I didn't quite understand the question, but Pisco Elqui is a Chilean town in the Coquimbo Region. --Rjcastillo 18:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
    The object is located in Pisco Elqui. Which category depends on Pisco Elqui? --XRay 06:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
     Done. --Rjcastillo 01:21, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
    I can't see any difference. --XRay 15:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
     Done Categorized. --Rjcastillo 22:42, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
    The camera position says Pisco Elqui. I can't find a category or subcategory of Pisco Elqui. Is it the same village as the village where you've taken your photograph. --XRay 11:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Barrels at Pisco Mistral Distillery. --Rjcastillo 04:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please add a category for the location. --XRay 04:31, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
     Done --Rjcastillo 21:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
    What do you think about Category:Pisco Elqui? --XRay 05:27, 10 February 2023 (UTC))
     Comment I didn't quite understand the question, but Pisco Elqui is a Chilean town in the Coquimbo Region. --Rjcastillo 18:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
    The object is located in Pisco Elqui. Which category depends on Pisco Elqui? --XRay 06:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
     Done. --Rjcastillo 01:21, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
    I can't see any difference. --XRay 15:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
     Done Categorized. --Rjcastillo 22:42, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
    The camera position says Pisco Elqui. I can't find a category or subcategory of Pisco Elqui. Is it the same village as the village where you've taken your photograph. --XRay 11:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

• To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
• You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
• The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.

Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted

• In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
• Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
• Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
• Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

File:Toronto_CN_Tower_4.jpg

• Nomination CN Tower of Toronto --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose There is a strong lighting artefact at the border between the building and the sky due to heavy tone mapping. --Augustgeyler 15:40, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • @Augustgeyler: Thanks for your review, I tried to fix it. Is it better?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 16:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
    •  Support Yes, you did improve it a lot. --Augustgeyler 19:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
    • @Augustgeyler: Thanks for your support, can you please remove the oppose vote? Otherwise, it will go to the consensual review. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
      •  Comment I did, but someone moved it back to consensual review. But I think other reviewers will agree here now. --Augustgeyler 08:19, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Augustgeyler 08:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

File:GMS_Europa_MMSI-27078300_Bamberg-20220805-RM-164442.jpg

• Nomination GMS Europa in the MD Canal --Ermell 09:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:04, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortunately, your images do not match the ship images in Category:Europa (ship, 1953, Vlissingen). Also, there appears to be some confusion in the data records for this ship at different forums. The name “Europa” and ENI number “04400500” are marked on the hull, along with the current owner – “JDK ShipService”. --GRDN711 17:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Vlissingen was added by another user. Thanks for your help. However, wrong categorization is not a reason to oppose.--Ermell 20:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Wrong categorization statement was entered as a comment just like the other image. As there was already a support vote, I presume the voting app registered the comment as an "oppose". Categorization now correct and I support this nomination. --GRDN711 (talk) 00:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment set to "Discuss". --Augustgeyler 18:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Ermell 07:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

File:7_Calea_Griviței,_Bucharest_(02).jpg

• Nomination House no. 7 on Calea Griviței, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 16:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality.--Der Angemeldete 18:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sky blown out at right side.--NorbertNagel 22:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment You see clearly from where the light is coming, so a small corner, that doensn't influence the main object in any kind of quality can't be seen as blown out. --Der Angemeldete 12:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose per NorbertNagel --Smial 11:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose yes, per others. --Augustgeyler 12:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 12:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Παρθεναγωγείο_Γαλαξιδίου_2082.jpg

• Nomination The former girl school of Galaxidi. --C messier 21:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 22:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noisy sky (fixable?), and the bit of the car is distracting (crop-able?), sorry. --Mike Peel 18:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Good enough. --Smial 11:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Augustgeyler 12:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Catedral,_Perugia,_Italia,_2022-09-20,_DD_08.jpg

• Nomination Cathedral, Perugia, Italy --Poco a poco 19:57, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad crop, geometric distortions --Yeriho 21:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment New version Poco a poco 20:35, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 10:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Mercedes-AMG_C_43_(S206)_1X7A6517.jpg

• Nomination Mercedes-AMG C 43 T in Filderstadt.--Alexander-93 18:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but main part of the roof is overexposed. --Augustgeyler 17:18, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Augustgeyler. Also distracting background --Smial 11:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment I tend to agree, but it's hard do deflect wether this is overexposure or just a reflexion, above all, when the rest of the picture is pretty normal illuminated. Happen's sometimes.--Der Angemeldete 12:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Agree This easily happens on hard reflecting surfaces. And I think this easily can make an image not QI. --Augustgeyler 12:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 12:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Armoiries_Emmanuelle_de_Dampierre.svg

• Nomination Armoiries de la princesse Emmanuelle de Dampierre, épouse de l'héritier du trône de France Jacques-Henri de Bourbon, par Stpiev, Grenadin07 13:29, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Looks too simple to me for QI --Poco a poco 18:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 09:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Pu'er_tea,_Chinese_tea,_Rostov-on-Don,_Russia.jpg

• Nomination Pu'er tea from Yunnan. Chinese tea. --Argenberg 13:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Looks like a randomed shot without any processing, far from QI --Poco a poco 09:35, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Quality seems ok to me. Nice chinese operating manual. --Der Angemeldete 10:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lights overexposed, subject too dark, looks like random. --XRay 06:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others casual shot... --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I find the natural-looking lighting actually very atmospheric and the idea with the reflective surfaces quite attractive. Unfortunately, the criticism of the overexposed background/lights is true and overall too many cluttered details distract from the main subject. --Smial 11:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Smial --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:19, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Decline?   --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:19, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Western_façade_of_the_Château_de_Villandry.jpg

• Nomination Western façade of the Château de Villandry --Ввласенко 21:19, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Wait, is this man on the pinnacles aiming with a crossbow against the photographer? What are we about to witness? It seems to me, like the perspective isn't right here, and correcting it would make little sense, since you uploaded files like File:Château de Villandry from the southwest.jpg that are way more accurate and would fit a QI better. Just my opinion. --Der Angemeldete 13:48, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, but I don't see crossbow or errors of perspective. Yes, there are a lot of photos of Villandry uploaded, maybe we should stop taking pictures of Villandry? -- Ввласенко 09:22, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment Or we should make the rights ones QI. Just saying. --Der Angemeldete 00:02, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:30, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Info It looks not like a crossbow to me, but something like a rod as a barrier and the man behind it holding something unspectacular :) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:09, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Between the teeth are cross beams for safety.-- Ввласенко 20:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose man, the joke became even funnier -.- But ok, let's make this pictures with bad perspective all QI. --Der Angemeldete 08:52, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lacking detail in the roofs, etc. --Tagooty 04:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support ok for me.--Ermell 10:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support A bit lack of sharpness, but the compo is very good. --Sebring12Hrs 06:18, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Ermell 10:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Corona_Schutzmaske-20200606-RM-163419.jpg

• Nomination Man with Corona protective mask --Ermell 10:17, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Image sombre, Grenadin07 11:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
  
•  Support I disagree. Main subject presented well. --Milseburg 11:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Quality seems ok to me, even though I can't find the esthetical purpose on this. --Der Angemeldete 08:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Possible Personality rights problems. --A.Savin 01:59, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Good technical quality. As for A.Savin's point, I think that should be a matter for a deletion discussion rather than a QI one. Please feel free to nominate for deletion any image you feel should not be on Commons.--Peulle 11:22, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per A.Savin. --Kallerna 19:47, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per A.Savin. I do not recognize any implied consent of the person to be photographed. Nor does it appear to be a person of public interest. --Smial 11:42, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Corona_Schutzmaske-20200606-RM-163306.jpg

• Nomination Woman with Corona protective mask in Bamberg --Ermell 10:08, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Visage dissimulé. De plus, aucun intérêt esthétique ou photographique, Grenadin07 11:43, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support I disagree. Unless you've been living under a rock for the last three years, it should be clear why wearing a face mask is an accurate depiction of a phenomenon in the world of late. The fact that the person's face is obscured is the point itself, not a negative.--Peulle 13:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support per Peulle. --Milseburg 15:49, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
  
•  Support Good quality, and per others. There's nothing ugly, anyway, about a woman wearing a mask. -- Ikan Kekek 03:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Question Did the lady know that she was photographed, and was she OK with publishing the photos? --A.Savin 02:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

  No response:  Oppose --A.Savin 01:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

   Comment Why the question, the face is covered by the mask as you can see.--Ermell 23:40, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

   Comment Here you can see an example of a mask really covering the face. Although, that one is still questionable whether she might be identified (due to uncommon eye colour IMO). Regards --A.Savin 14:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

   Comment Have there already been any court rulings in this regard? According to the STVO, a person wearing a mask is no longer recognizable.--Ermell 20:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

  Why does it always have to be a (case)law? somewhere We are a community of photographers for educational purposes, a basic level of professional ethics should be taken into account IMO. --A.Savin 22:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Also a "Pro" due to quality issues.--Der Angemeldete 08:31, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per A.Savin. --Kallerna 19:48, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose per A.Savin. --Augustgeyler 12:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per A.Savin. I do not recognize any implied consent of the person to be photographed. Nor does it appear to be a person of public interest. --Smial 11:43, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 18:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Corona_Schutzmaske-20200606-RM-163304.jpg

• Nomination Woman with Corona protective mask in Bamberg --Ermell 09:28, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Peulle 12:56, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Yeux fermés, etc. Grenadin07 18:28, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Set to "Discuss", because there are two contradicting votes. However, I am not sure whether the user may vote here because they have less than 50 edits on Commons, but lots of edits in the French Wikipedia. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:36, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my support Technically good quality. There is a hot pixel that should be fixed (have highlighted it in the file). Not sure about the aesthetic quality, particularly with the closed eyes, but seems good enough. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Moving to  Neutral, A.Savin raises a good point. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:09, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
    •  Done Thanks for the review.--Ermell 10:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Possible Personality Rights' problems. Non-ethic at the very least: telephoto lens shot of random people without that they even notice? --A.Savin 01:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment My question would be: are there such problems with those pictures uploaded to US-Servers? We've learned in the past, that Commons makes it's own laws, when it comes down to claiming personal rights oder copyright issues. If there are laws in the US to protect personal rights of people taken by random photograph, it would be a problem of a lot of pictures, that were made QI over time.--Der Angemeldete 12:42, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • There is a big difference between incidental and main subject, though. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
    • Doesn't matter for the argument. If there are laws against those images even one QI of those unintended persona shots would be illegal.--Der Angemeldete 11:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per A.Savin. --Kallerna 19:48, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per A.Savin. I do not recognize any implied consent of the person to be photographed. Nor does it appear to be a person of public interest. --Smial 11:43, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 18:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)

• Wed 15 Feb → Thu 23 Feb
• Thu 16 Feb → Fri 24 Feb
• Fri 17 Feb → Sat 25 Feb
• Sat 18 Feb → Sun 26 Feb
• Sun 19 Feb → Mon 27 Feb
• Mon 20 Feb → Tue 28 Feb
• Tue 21 Feb → Wed 01 Mar
• Wed 22 Feb → Thu 02 Mar
• Thu 23 Feb → Fri 03 Mar