User talk : Alexmar983

Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ball girl[edit]

Hi. She is behind the goal post. --E4024 (talk) 01:37, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

E4024 I saw that person but it wasn't very clear, IMHO. But if you say she is, fine. It's probably not a very useful categorization when the depicted target has a low quality, but it's subjective so not a big deal. Have a nice wiki.--Alexmar983 (talk) 01:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Cristina Giachi or Category:Cristina Gachi ?[edit]

Should categories be merged? DGtal (talk) 13:32, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:ديفيد_عادل_وهبة_خليل_2 created a wrong category. The vicemayor of Florence is Giachi. Gachi sounds a very rare surname in Italian. Maybe I wrote Gachi in some description and (s)he got confused, but the category created by me on February, 13th is the correct one.--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alexmar983, @DGtal: It makes no sense to add two categories on the same topic in the same file!You can empty and request deletion of the wrong category ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:57, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If this means that I left by mistake a red link somewhere is possible but I though i already removed them. It was inserted by mistake, never created, removed, the correct category was created, and the description states "Giachi". I mean, it was quite easy to see it was a typo.--Alexmar983 (talk) 14:02, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was probably distracted by something, I remember I spent 15 minutes trying to find a decent third-party bibliometric ID for a wikidata item to connect to the category, and I couldn't find it, she has a publication on wikidata but no SCOPUS profile yet, it happens in her field. maybe I lost track there. But I do leave a lot of information in the files, enough to clearly spot the correct name. I mean, if I create a red category that is inserted, I click on the files, so I would have spot immediately that it was a typo. that's why i leave so many information in the first place. In any case do as you wish, if by tonight it is not solved I can fix it easily.--Alexmar983 (talk) 14:21, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@DGtal:

Done it took one second with cat-a-lot to remove it. To be honest, I though I did that already, maybe there was a connection problem that night. In any case User:ديفيد_عادل_وهبة_خليل_2 a left over red link is no big problem per se, I would have noticed myself reusing those files I suspect at a future event at the lab of professor Banci in few months.

If I might suggest, when you create categories from red links please look inside the files which will be included there at least once. You would have noticed, opening the file, that it was a typo. If you don't know a language, leave it there or ask. I am aware Commons has a huge backlog and everybody is trying to do their best... I hope structured data will help us to deal it with this more efficiently than now, but "fast-pace" editing is what gave us amount of files to organize, and mistake to correct in the first place so it is not going to be the solution. I feel more and more frustrated to spend hours to add parent categories, look for coordinates, create new categories, improving wikidata connection all manually to end up again in a chain of these events. Of course when you don't look for geoocordinates, information on line and so on you have much more time to notice your correction to a typo didn't occur as you though. It's funny that if I uploaded the same files with much less information so more time to spot that typo (even if perfectly visible just opening the file), it would have been better from this perspective. Something here on Commons is clearly not working at a systemic level, IMHO.

Now, I go to create the wikidata item of Giachi in any case even if the identifiers are not perfect.--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:53, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This might be her VIAF page, which connects to a few more identifiers. Just check if it is the same person. The chief work cited there is "Diritto e giurisprudenza in Roma antica". DGtal (talk) 07:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes DGtal it's her. Thanks. So when something is in the auto-completion of the "Search Terms:" search bar on VIAF but it's not found with a direct enter (if I type Cristina Giachi on VIAF, "no heading found for") it is still possible to find the VIAF ID. I have never learned how to do that.--Alexmar983 (talk) 11:32, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I usually get "no heading found for" when I forget to choose an option in "Select Field:", and that happens quite often. DGtal (talk) 12:04, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Structured Data - development update, March 2019[edit]

This text is also posted on the Structured Data hub talk page. You can reply there with questions, comments, or concerns.

A development update for the current work by the Structured Data on Commons team:

After the release of multilingual file captions, work began on getting depicts and other statements ready for release. These were originally scheduled for release in February and into March, however there are currently two major blockers to finishing this work (T215642, T217157). We will know more next week about when depicts and statements can likely be ready for testing and then release; until then I've tentatively updated the release schedule.

Once the depicts feature is ready for testing, it will take place in two stages on TestCommons. The first is checking the very basics; is the design comfortable, how does the simple workflow of adding/editing/removing statements work, and building up help and process pages from there. The second part is a more detailed test of depicts and other statements, checking the edge-case examples of using the features, bugs that did not come up during simple testing, etc. Additionally we'll be looking with the community for bugs in interaction with bots, gadgets, and other scripts once the features are live on Commons. Please let me know if you're interesting in helping test and fix these bugs if they show up upon release, it is really hard to find them in a test environment or, in some cases, bugs won't show up in a testing environment at all.

One new thing is definitely coming within the next few weeks, pending testing: the ability to search for captions. This is done using the inlabel keyword in search strings, and will be the first step in helping users find content that is specifically structured data. I'll post a notice when that feature is live and ready for use.

Thanks, let me know if you have questions about these plans. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Business integration partners[edit]

Ciao, scusa, ma non riesco a capire come mai non funzione il Wikidata infobox su questa categoria. --Carlo Dani (talk) 17:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

qui User:Carlo Dani va messa l'informazione della connessione fra le pagine interprogetto.--Alexmar983 (talk) 18:10, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

UTC)UTC)

Scusa ma non l’ho mai fatto prima... e non serviva, mi sembra. Cosa devo fare esattamente? --Carlo Dani (talk) 16:54, 22 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Carlo Dani scusa ma sono all'estero con poca rete. Guarda il diff che ti ho mandato. Devi andare nella sezione "altri progetti" e mettere a sinistra "commons" e nel box "category:X". A quel punto inserendo l'Infobox saprà da quale elemento importare dati. Poi ti dovrei spiegare perché commons non ha una sezione a parte come altre piattaforme e come mai si usa a volte collegare alle gallerie e a volte alle categorie, ma lo farei un'altra volta. Prova questo esempio: collega Category:Hotel Italia (Marina di Massa) con Wikidata Infobox a d:Q3786943.--Alexmar983 (talk) 18:00, 22 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

fatto, e avevo già fatto. Non funzionava solo perché avevo scritto “Template Infobox” tra le graffe con la I maiuscola... ora che ho corretto con la i minuscola funziona. Grazie ǃ --Carlo Dani (talk) 21:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Carlo Dani non so se la i minuscola dia problemi, io uso anche "WI", comunque wikidata va sempre correttamente collegato.--Alexmar983 (talk) 07:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Structured Data - early depicts testing[edit]

The Structured Data on Commons development team has the very basic version of depicts statements available for early testing on Test-Commons. You can add very basic depicts statements to the file page by going into the new “Structured Data” tab located below the "Open in Media Viewer button." You can use the Latest Files link in the left side nav bar to select existing images, or use the UploadWizard to upload new ones to test with (although those images won’t actually show up on the site). The test site is not a fully functional replica of Commons, so there may be some overall problems in using the site, but you should be able to get a general idea of what using the feature is like.

Early next week I will call for broad, community-wide testing of the feature similar to what we did for Captions, with instructions for testing, known bugs, and a dedicated space to discuss the feature as well as a simple help page for using statements. Until then, you're welcome to post on the SDC talk page with what you might find while testing depicts.

Thanks in advance for trying it out, you'll be hearing more from me next week. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WikiScience competition 2019[edit]

Hello , Alex How can I be a jury for my country. Goddyliz (talk) 11:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Goddyliz hi! The competition is in November. So far, i doubt any African subsaharian country will have a national jury, but in principle it is possible. If your country does not have an involved chapter or UG you will be asked to be a second-level international juror. In practice, you will be listed in this page and you will evaluate all the images coming from the "rest of the world". Do you like the idea? Last year I could only find an archeologist from Kenya and a biologist who has south African citizenship to represent Africa, we only had some images from Kenya if I remember correctly. I am glad to see new faces around.--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please can you explain further because my country has UG and also steps to be a juror if possible? Goddyliz (talk) 14:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Goddyliz your country did not ask to an organizing country so far (preminary requestes come from Portugal, Switzerland, Russia, Australia, Russia...), but it could. If it does not, the upload will be still possible, there is just no national prize and no national jury and what is uploaded goes directly to a general category where it is competing for the international prizes. You can always ask your local chapter to be part of WSC2019 with a full national competition, but beware that the international team has not enough manpower to fill any gaps, we had complicated situations of countries who left at the middle of the process last edition, so be sure your country is really motivated. In any case you can be a second-level juror with no problem.--Alexmar983 (talk) 14:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Goddyliz do you still want to be a juror? We can add you to the second-level jury.--Alexmar983 (talk) 18:50, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Structured Data - testing qualifiers for depicts[edit]

As you might have seen, testing is underway for adding qualifiers to depicts statements. If you have not left feedback already, the Structured Data on Commons development team is very interested in hearing about your experience using qualifiers on the file page and in the UploadWizard. To get started you can visit Test-Commons and chose a random file to test out, or upload your own file to try out the UploadWizard. Questions, comments, and concerns can be left on the Structured data talk page and the team will address them as best as they can. Thank you for your time. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:08, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:17-12-01 PRC RenMinBi banknotes.jpg[edit]

File:17-12-01 PRC RenMinBi banknotes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

神樂坂秀吉 (talk) 12:30, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Structured Data on Commons - IRC office hours this week, 18 July[edit]

The Structured Data team is hosting an IRC office hour this week on Thursday, 18 July, from 17:00-18:00 UTC. Joining information as well as date and time conversion is available on Meta. Potential topics for discussion are the testing of "other statements", properties that may need to be created for Commons on Wikidata soon, plans for the rest of SDC development, or whatever you might want to discuss. The development team looks forward to seeing you there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File duplicato (senza motivo)[edit]

Ciao. Posso chiederti , tu che sei sicuramente più ferrato di me circa certi meccanismi? Ho appena caricato su Wikipedia questo file inerente Andrea Camilleri; essendo il file datato 1998 - e quindi posteriore al 1975, data-limite per il PD-Italy qui su Commons - l'ho per l'appunto caricato esclusivamente nell'enciclopedia... però, senza alcuna azione da parte mia, me lo sono ritrovato immediatamente duplicato qui su Commons (File:Andrea Camilleri (Roma, 1998).jpg), e per giunta la cosa viene riportata come fatta da... me! Che è successo? Non voglio certo passare per uno che vìola licenze e diritti d'autore... — dany ele 16:05, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Danyele questa è nuova anche per me. Per carità era ora che velocizzassero i meccanismi di sincronizzazione quando i file sono dichiarati sicuri come licenze (e appunto siamo dopo il 1976 quindi non lo è), ma non sapevo nulla. Mi sa che devi chiedere al bar. Escludo comunque che sia una preferenza dell'utente. Io poi figurati non carico mai nulla in locale. Meglio se chiedi al bar. Non ricordo nessuna discussione in merito. Chiedi prima qua su commons in modo da chiarire che sei innocente in caso di "violazione" di copyright, poi eventualmente indaga su itwikipedia.--Alexmar983 (talk) 16:11, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Structured Data - testing other statements[edit]

You can now test using other statements for structured data on the file page on Test-Commons. Some datatypes are not yet available, such a coordinates, but further support will be extended soon. You can find more information about testing on the SDC talk page. The team looks forward to your feedback. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:41, 24 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Toscana sta per iniziare[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

L'organizzazione di Wiki Loves Monuments per il 2019 ha proseguito e qua potete consultare il lavoro dei volontari.

Qui potete valutare quanto è stato liberato finora. Nuove liberatorie arriveranno nei prossimi giorni.

Il primo settembre inizia il concorso, ti preghiamo di informare le persone interessate vicino a te e, se puoi, anche di condividere i post sui vari canali sociali.

Qui e qui e qui è possibile scaricare il volantino di promozione regionale in alcune delle lingue più comuni per i turisti.

messaggio discusso qui. Per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it

@WikiToscana

#WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesMonuments2019

Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery--23:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Toscana è iniziato[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

Dopo mesi di lavoro Wiki Loves Monuments sta è iniziato alcune ore fa anche in Toscana. Il caricamento è aperto fino al 30 di settembre.

Qui potete valutare quanto è stato liberato finora. Fra i nuovi beni già trascritti abbiamo proprietà da Aulla, Comano, Lucca, Careggine, Coreglia Antelminelli, San Miniato, Calcinaia, Cascina, Pontedera, Ponsacco, Capannoli, Pomarance, Prato, Carmignano, Poggio a Caiano, Cantagallo, Vernio, Sesto Fiorentino, Scarperia e San Piero, Rignano sull'Arno, San Godenzo, Barberino Tavernelle, Dicomano, Fucecchio, Castelnuovo Berardenga, Santa Fiora, Castell'Azzarra e nuove adesioni da Pescia e Piombino.

Nuove liberatorie (probabilmente Massa, Carrara, Palaia, Vaiano, Scandicci, Palazzuolo sul Senio, Castel Focognano e Bucine) continueranno a arrivare nei prossimi giorni quindi ricontrolla sempre gli elenchi a cadenza regolare.

Ti preghiamo di informare le persone interessate e, se puoi, anche di condividere i post sui vari canali sociali. qui si possono scaricare i volantini regionali.

Messaggio discusso qui. Per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

toscanawikimedia.it

@WikiToscana

#WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesMonuments2019

Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery--10:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Campaign e WLC 2019[edit]

Ciao! Stasera ho dato un'occhiata ai nostri link Campaign per vedere di cominciare a categorizzare qualche immagine, tuttavia ne ho trovate solo due in Grecia (in generale, mi pare che in molti paesi, Italia esclusa ovviamente, finora sia stato caricato molto molto poco). Più che altro, ho notato il seguente problema: le pagine Campaign mostrano soltanto le ultime circa 20 immagini caricate e poi, per tutte le precedenti, rimandano alla categoria corrispondente, che però contiene anche le immagini di tutte le edizioni precedenti delle rispettive WLM. Dunque, o c'è un modo di ottenere che la pagina Campaign mostri almeno 100 o 200 file per pagina, oppure bisogna trovare un modo di filtrare i file contenuti nelle categorie per anno di caricamento, altrimenti vedo molto difficile la missione di selezionare i file di nostro interesse. Buona notte e a presto! --Epìdosis 20:35, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Epìdosis ti stavo per scrivere la stessa cosa, sta categorizzando anche io (mi son confuso ed erano foto del 2018). Mentre ci penso, volevo dirti di studiare anche Petscan che sicuramente qualcosa si ritrova, altrimenti si scorrono a mano le categorie come Category:Images_from_Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2019_in_Italy, possiamo diluire il lavoro comunque.--Alexmar983 (talk) 20:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

anche se io interseco Category:Uploaded via Campaign:wlm-xx con data di upload comunque non tutti i files sono caricati con l'interfaccia (utenti esperti che inseriscono dopo il template) quindi per scrupolo bisogna sempre fare nei limite del possibile un controllo incrociato.--Alexmar983 (talk) 20:40, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

appena ho concluso il grosso della questione del grant lasceremo anche un messaggio al bar di commons per informare anche le utenze manutentive oltre che i manager nazionali.--Alexmar983 (talk) 20:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

La scelta migliore è scorrere a mano categorie come Category:Images_from_Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2019_in_Italy, è molto meglio che usare i link Campaign. Correggo di conseguenza la nostra tabella. --Epìdosis 20:45, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ne ho appena buttate sei dal lazio. ora informo i due uploader principali italiani (e poi pure quelli stranieri) e per il resto c'è un modo di codificare forse una visione più vasta di foto caricate ma non mi viene.--Alexmar983 (talk) 20:48, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ho informato Mongolo1984 e Sailko, con una strategia di informazione mirata dovremmo riuscire a categorizzarne abbastanza prima di informare tutti quando la situazione finanziaria si è stabilizzata.--Alexmar983 (talk) 20:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Septembrie 2019: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România![edit]

Primiți acest mesaj deoarece ați participat anterior la concursul Wiki Loves Monuments România.

Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.

Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Toscana - nuovi beni aderenti[edit]

Gentili fotografi, un ultimo aggiornamento in vista dei prossimi week end. Segnaliamo che dal primo settembre si sono aggiunti per WLM2019 nuovi beni a Pescia, Cascina, Careggine, Pomarance, Vinci e Castelfiorentino. Sono inoltre state trascritte delibere provenienti per la prima volta anche dai comuni di Massa, Carrara, Rufina, Follonica e San Vincenzo. Date un'occhiata perché non è escluso che arrivino ancora altre adesioni integrative all'ultimo minuto.
Messaggio discusso qui. Per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery--12:07, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Structured Data - computer-aided tagging[edit]

The development team is starting work on one of the last planned features for SDC v1.0, a lightweight tool to suggest depicts tags for images. I've published a project page for it, please have a look. I plan to share this page with everyone on Commons much more broadly in the coming days. The tool has been carefully designed to try to not increase any workload on Commons volunteers; for starters, it will be opt-in for auto-confirmed users only and will not generate any sort of backlog here on Commons. Additionally, the tool is highly privacy-minded for the contributors and publicly-minded for the third party being used, in this case Google. The implementation and usage notes contain more information about these and other potential concerns as a starting place. It's really important that the tool is implemented properly from the start, so feedback is welcome. Questions, comments, concerns are welcome on the talk page and I will get answers as quickly as possible as things come up. On the talk page you can also sign up to make sure you're a part of the feedback for designs and prototype testing. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Vajont disaster[edit]

Please, if there isn't copyright, can you upload here the photographies from these Italian sites about the most important protagonist about that disaster: 1, 2, 3, 4. Thank you very much. --87.2.63.34 06:34, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Structured Data - blogs posted in Wikimedia Space[edit]

There are two separate blog entries for Structured Data on Commons posted to Wikimedia Space that are of interest:

Working with Structured Data on Commons: A Status Report, by Lucas Werkmeister, discusses some ways that editors can work with structured data. Topics include tools that have been written or modified for structured data, in addition to future plans for tools and querying services.
Structured Data on Commons - A Blog Series, written by me, is a five-part posting that covers the basics of the software and features that were built to make structured data happen. The series is meant to be friendly to those who may have some knowledge of Commons, but may not know much about the structured data project.

I hope these are informative and useful, comments and questions are welcome. All the blogs offer a comment feature, and you can log in with your Wikimedia account using oAuth. I look forward to seeing some posts over there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:33, 23 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Categorie[edit]

Ciao, se una cosa sta già nella categoria "fountains in Marina di Carrara" non è ridondante aggiungerla alla categoria "Marina di Carrara"?--Lombres (talk) 22:14, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Lombres sì ma mi pareva fosse "fountains in Carrara" non "fountains in Marina di Cararra". Scusa sono zeppo di categorie da fare, guarda meglio anche tu. Ci torno dopo.--Alexmar983 (talk) 22:16, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

quelle le sto già facendo io, solo le ultime foto le ho caricate prima di creare la categoria per riuscire a finire prima di mezzanotte, ma ora le sto categorizzando --Lombres (talk) 22:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Se hai creato la sottocategoria fountains in Marina di Carrara puoi togliere l'altra Lombres, ho visto comunque che te ne stavi occupando e se noti sto facendo altri comuni. Almeno un po' vanno messi a modo per ridurre il caos adesso, domani mi devo occupare della giuria.--Alexmar983 (talk) 22:24, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

le categorie delle immagini che ho caricato io (Castelnuovo Magra, Carrara e Pisa) ora dovrebbero essere a posto, domani aggiungo le immagini mancanti su Wikidata e sistemo le coordinate per Carrara --Lombres (talk) 22:26, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ok Lombres--Alexmar983 (talk) 22:37, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Structured Data - modeling data[edit]

As you may have seen, there are community discussions underway on how to best model structured data on Commons.

Direct links to pages created so far:

Please visit and participate in topics you might be interested in when you get some time. Thanks. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:39, 2 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sigla provincia di Massa Carrara[edit]

Ciao, ti volevo segnalare che la sigla della provincia di Massa Carrara è MS, ma nell'archivio delle autorizzazioni ricevute risulta MC (che invece è Macerata): questa è la cartella di Carrara con MC, questa è la cartella di Aulla con MC, mentre Comano ha la sigla giusta MS. L'autorizzazione di Massa invece non riesco a trovarla. Non so se puoi correggere tu, altrimenti chiedo a Sannita --Lombres (talk) 10:16, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Lombres non posso correggere e per il resto non ho ancora finito di verificare le cartelle con le autorizzazioni in quella provincia, cioè la fase in cui scarico i documenti effettivi in mano a WMI che potrebbe non essere alcuni d quelli usati da me. Quindi scusa se non avevo notato. Ma sai non è la prima volta che ci si trovano errori, p.e. Santa Fiora presa come Santa Flora... non dovrebbero essere gestiti con questi passaggi manuali, ma pazienza...--Alexmar983 (talk) 14:26, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Structured Data - computer-aided tagging designs[edit]

I've published a design consultation for the computer-aided tagging tool. Please look over the page and participate on the talk page. If you haven't read over the project page, it might be helpful to do so first. The tool will hopefully be ready by the end of this month (October 2019), so timely feedback is important. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:09, 9 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: WSC Spain[edit]

Hi Alexmar983. The page is almost ready, I just have to do a few updates on the jury section. When are you going to start the social media campaign? To coordinate it, you can contact my colleague Virginia, who is in charge of communication. Best, --Rodelar (talk) 10:44, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! Thank you Rodelar... Virginia do you have a profile to promote to the internatioanl jury? Eight names are confirmed here, there is an Indian guy coming soon with expertise in physics, so we miss at least another one who is available for national chapters to be selected. I can maybe arrive to 12 names, it's no big deal.

About the social media campaign, twitter and facebook ae active and I will ping WMES soon. Please notice that there is no Instagram yet, mayve next time (lack of time)--Alexmar983 (talk) 10:58, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Foto della provincia di Grosseto e Siena[edit]

Scusami se ti ho risposto tardi, ma la risposta era negativa. Non ho foto, ma se mi dici di quali comuni servono per l'anno prossimo le faccio in estate. Io villeggio sull'Amiata--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:08, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Io vado ad Agosto, presto per capire se arriveranno altre foto. Tanto vale fare le foto se vado (ripensandoci potrebbe essere in realtà la prima estate in cui i miei figli decidono di fare le vacanze da soli, l'età è ormai quella). Poi ci sentiamo sul cosa fotografare--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cilt[edit]

Ma tu stai andando a Pisa il 10? Ma è aperto a tutti? C'è una pagina dell'evento? Grazie--Pierpao.lo (listening) 15:43, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pierpao oddio avendo un incontro a Pisa alle 18:00 non ho controllato se posso andarci comunque sì è aperto a tutti che io sappia. Ciao--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:27, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Toscana - premiazione[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

La cerimonia di premiazione di WLM2019 regionale si terrà a Pescia il giorno 1 dicembre alle h. 17:00, come comunicato anche su Facebook. Qui il volantino.

Tutti i finalisti del secondo round sono invitati a prendere un premio (gli altri partecipanti possono anche essi prenderne uno, ma dopo che avranno ritirato i loro premi i finalisti)

Il 23 novembre, come comunicato anche su Facebook è prevista anche la cerimonia di premiazione locale di Prato e provincia presso la Biblioteca Lazzerini.

Messaggio discusso qui. Per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

toscanawikimedia.it

@WikiToscana

#WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesMonuments2019

Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery--15:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.[edit]

Dear Alexmar983,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2019[edit]

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. There is also an international upload category with no national prize.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in the national categories even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate such files at next step. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--20:45, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wappen Berchtold zu Ungarschütz.jpg[edit]

Dear Alexmar, can you explain to me why these coats of arms like the one mentioned above are "obviously ineligible" in the Wiki Science Competition ? After all heraldry is as much a part of history as archaeology, and the drawings themselves are dating back till 1890 - they are historic testimonies themselves. Or is history no "science" according to the rules of this competition ? Looking forward to your answer Xenophon (talk) 22:52, 1 january 2020 (UTC)

Xenophon archeology is traditionally included, since the first editions of the competitions (I was not involved at the time) but images that are kept are usual related to images of people at work or reconstructions that requires something loosely scientific as an approach. For example a map produced using for example sampling of grounds or orographic surveys and analysis of artifacts in a laboratory. Descriptions of technological approaches are also included as well, like new method of representations. Something like that. These files of coat of arms looked more as the product of a careful research in a library in a field that is quite far away from the examples you can find on the international or national description pages of WSC.

I can keep them there but they will never be picked as finalists, after more than 12000 files I think I can predict that. I mean, sometimes people keep more or less but I wouldn't be optimistic. I would have kept models or relief-maps, but in the end I am only skipping some workload for the jurors based on an averaged experience, and keep in mind that I am tolerant, if I can give the jurors more role in the clean up of the very first step, but I am also committed to reduce their workload so they have more time to check carefully the files. The link of unsuitable files is always given by mail to the jurors if they want to double check, in any case. Some people are just quite busy so it's a sign of respect to perform a little clean up.

So in the end, I don't think they have great chances but I can keep them, link all of them to the jurors of the international second-level jury and voilà. --Alexmar983 (talk) 23:20, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's all right, keep it that way. I just wanted to know on which criteria your decision is founded. Thank you for your information. Regards Xenophon(talk) 07:42, 2 january 2020 (UTC)

Xenophon thank you for uploading some files in Austria, it's complicated to have files from countries with no national juries.--Alexmar983 (talk) 12:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)[edit]

Dear Alexmar983,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:21, 23 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Giurato[edit]

Se si può fare a distanza si sono a Lecce--Pierpao.lo (listening) 13:11, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ci sono. In pratica cosa bisogna fare, quali foto esattamente?--Pierpao.lo (listening) 13:37, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Una paio di giorni per decidere ponderatamente ci sono? Ho già sgrossato--Pierpao.lo (listening) 16:51, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Pierpao/WLM Le prime tre sono le tre che non ci sono. Non ho capito cosa spostare e soprattutto dove. Un link per favore. Scusami per il ritardo ma proprio la settimana scorsa la mia compagna ha scoperto che sua madre non forse non sta bene e non ci sono con la testa. Poi al sud è sempre tutto complicatissimo. Di solito sono veloce ed efficiente--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:51, 24 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

With apologies[edit]

I have restored the page as you requested. I will assist if I am able however your language skills are considerably better than mine so possibly you can assist as well. I hope this is satisfactory. Regards --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:57, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File[edit]

Hello; thank you for noticed me about it. In fact I have mixed up the two interfaces ; my bad ! On one my profile don’t appear and it appears on the second one .. The file concerned is a ghost in your talk about .. i don’t drive again well the interface ! And my website link is broken so as soon i can , I take my computer to fix all that . I’m currently on iPhone . Many thanks for the infos . Veronica. Instagram Veronica.in.dream VeronicaInDream (talk) 02:33, 2 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: Foto Torino[edit]

Ciao, scusa per il leggerissimo ritardo con cui ti rispondo (giuro che non avevo davvero visto il tuo messaggio e l'ho notato solo ora per caso) Parlavi di unoi strumento per vedere che foto mancassero a Torino. Potrebbe interessarmi.--Bruce The Deus (talk) 13:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Commission en direct.JPG[edit]

File:Commission en direct.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ciao[edit]

Come stai? Ma mi hai scritto da qualche parte? perchè, forse si è preso il corona anche lui, o forse se lo sono preso gli sviluppatori, mediawiki da sempre più spesso di matto, pagine non aggiornate agli ip, errori del database, adesso mi è arrivata una notifica che mi hai scritto--Pierpao.lo (listening) 07:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No Pierpao roba vecchia... notifiche che riappaiono dopo settimane... Ti avrei mandato una mail per la premiazione a Follonica ma lo sai che è saltato tutto in quei gorni. tu tutto bene?--Alexmar983 (talk) 11:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Si abbastanza grazie mille--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons - Media Search[edit]

Greetings,

The Structured Data team is working on an alternative, image-focused prototype for media search on Commons. The prototype uses categories, structured data as well as wikitext from Commons, and Wikidata to find its results. The development team would like your feedback on the prototype, as they are looking to work to further enhance the search experience on Commons. If you have a moment, please look over the project page set up on Commons to find a link to the prototype and leave your feedback on the talk page. Thanks for your time, I'll be posting message similar to this one to other pages on Commons. The team is looking forward to reading what you think. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:47, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Toscana - preparazione[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

Stiamo organizzando Wiki Loves Monuments per il 2020.

Il concorso si tiene a settembre ma ci muoviamo con anticipo. Purtroppo non all'inizio della primavera come altri anni a causa dell'emergenza COVID-19, ma abbiamo iniziato a fine maggio dopo una pausa di due mesi. Puoi consultare in questa pagina il lavoro in corso.

Ci sono monumenti (o intere amministrazioni) che mancano vicino alla tua zona di interesse? Fallo presente e vedremo di fare il possibile!

Prossimo aggiornamento a inizio luglio, con i comuni nuovi sicuramente aderenti e le integrazioni.

La premiazione 2020 si terrà a Prato.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it

#WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesMonuments

Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Famiglie senesi di Buonconvento[edit]

Ciao. Ho trovato solo quattro riscontri attendibili (tutti presenti nella prima immagine, nessuno nella seconda): Beccafumi (stemma con la banda caricata di tre stelle di sei punte), Boninsegni (scaglione acompagnato da tre rocchi di scacchiere), Docci (leone che tiene la clava), Malavolti (scala con quattro scalini). Per gli altri non sono riuscito a individuare dei cognomi presenti nel mio sito. Per informazione: il palazzo risulta in vendita a solo 750.000 € (se decidi di comprarlo fatti dare l'elenco dei podestà dal notaio). Non sono riuscito a trovare su internet l'elenco dei podestà di Buonconvento, che potrebbe essere di enorme aiuto. Buon lavoro.--Massimop (talk) 22:52, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Per Sant'Antimo purtroppo non ho trovato nulla: senza la minima indicazione sul cognome mi è praticamente impossibile. Purtroppo non dispongo ancora di un dizionario che consenta di passare dal disegno alla famiglia; è già complicato passare dalla famiglia al disegno ...Ci sto lavorando, ma serviranno decenni. Ciao. --Massimop (talk) 19:53, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re:Aiuto con WLM[edit]

Ciao, nessun problema: fatto. --Pufui PcPifpef (talk) 21:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Toscana sta per iniziare[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

Continua la preparazione di Wiki Loves Monuments per il 2020.

Manca una settimana alla partenza e per chi fosse già in giro ricordiamo le nuove località aderenti, già riportate nelle nostre liste in costante aggiornamento.

Nel 2020 hanno completato l'iter di ampliamento le amministrazioni di Cascina, Pomarance, Pescia, Empoli, San Quirico d'Orcia, Chiusi, Santa Fiora e Piombino, mentre hanno aderito per la prima volta a tempo indefinito il Museo delle Aviotruppe di Pisa e i comuni di Pescaglia, Gallicano, Camaiore, Santa Croce sull'Arno, Casale Marittimo, Quarrata, Montelupo Fiorentino, Buonconvento, Pratovecchio Stia, Sansepolcro, Castiglion Fiorentino, Anghiari, Badia Tedalda e Campiglia Marittima. Ci sono anche adesioni solo per il 2020 di alcune dimore storiche attorno a Pisa.

Risultano al momento richieste formali o informali di partecipazione o ampliamento della copertura da un'altra ventina di enti e amministrazioni, alcune delle quali potrebbero concretizzarsi nelle prossime due settimane. Fate attenzione che alcune delle adesioni solo per l'edizione 2019 nel nord della provincia di Prato e del comune di Massa non saranno probabilmente confermate, ma non sono ancora state rimosse dalle liste.

Qui il video promozionale del 2019 e qui quello della nuova edizione.

Il prossimo aggiornamento riporterà i volantini in più lingue e gli ultimi sviluppi sulle adesioni.

Ricordiamo che la premiazione 2020 si terrà a Prato.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it

#WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesMonuments

Alexmar983 tramite -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Septembrie 2020: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România![edit]

Deși trecem prin momente dificile în aceste vremuri imprevizibile generate de pandemia de COVID-19, competiția Wiki Loves Monuments are loc și anul acesta, implicit și în România.

Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Întrucât o carantină nu este programată în România, puteți să ieșiți în continuare să faceți fotografii - luând toate măsurile de siguranță recomandate de autoritățile locale de sănătate. Dacă preferați să evitați ieșirile, cu siguranță aveți fotografii cu monumente înregistrate pe calculator din ultima călătorie! Aceasta este o oportunitate excelentă de a le oferi o a doua viață prin concursului Wiki Loves Monuments. Pe lângă faptul că vor fi vizibile pentru toată lumea, fotografiile dumneavoastră ar putea reprezenta România în competiția internațională. De asemenea ele pot apărea în diverse articole la Wikipedia și pot contribui la conservarea online a patrimoniului cultural și istoric al României.

Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.

Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes vă dorim și să vă bucurați, în condiții de siguranță, de patrimoniul care vă înconjoară!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Toscana è in corso[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

Gazie alla preparazione e al vostro impegno, WLM è un successo in regione anche per questa edizione. Siamo stabilmente primi per caricamenti a livello nazionale: qui potete vedere alcune statistiche. Al momento risultano più reattive le province di Livorno, Siena, Pisa, Prato e Firenze.

Fra i nuovi beni aderenti confermati, e inseriti nelle liste, segnaliamo i comuni di Castel del Piano, Montignoso e la Domus Mazziniana di Pisa. Ci sono nuovi beni anche dal comune di Santa Fiora. Sono comunque in corso le verifiche sulla proprietà di alcuni edifici religiosi. C'è invece un aggiornamento nella lista di San Vincenzo, che aveva autorizzato annualmente nel 2019 e ha ridotto i beni aderenti. Per quanto riguarda le foto panoramiche, vengono smistate direttamente nelle categorie dei comuni e richiedono maggiore manutenzione, quindi vi preghiamo se possibile la cortesia di posticipare il loro caricamento a fine mese quando avremo più tempo di occuparcene.

La campagna sociale in concerto su tutti e tre i canali (per Facebook la pagina Wiki Loves Toscana) prevede ogni quattro giorni una serie divulgativa sulle foto delle edizioni precedenti in bianco e nero (caricate progressivamente qui su Commons) alternata a una serie sulle foto migliori dell'edizione in corso. Ogni giorno nel tardo pomeriggio o prima serata solo su Twitter e Facebook (gruppo ToscanaWiki) viene inoltre postata una foto fra quelle giunte prediligendo variabilità di luogo e tema.

Qui i volantini in più lingue.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it

Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2020 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2020 #WLM2020

Alexmar983 tramite -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:12, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons - Media Sarch, new feedback round[edit]

Greetings,

I'm following up on a message from earlier in the year about the prototype development for Special:MediaSearch. Based on community feedback, the Structured Data team has developed some new features for Special:MediaSearch and are seeking another round of comments and discussions about the tool. Commons:Structured_data/Media_search is updated with details about the new features plus some other development information, and feedback is welcome on Commons talk:Structured_data/Media_search. Media Search works in any language, so the team would especially appreciate input around support for languages other than English. I look forward to reading about what you think. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Foto WLM in copyviol[edit]

Ciao, questa non è in violazione di copyright? L'autorizzazione è per piazza Bovio, mica per le esposizioni di artisti viventi che ci fanno dentro! --Lombres (talk) 21:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Lombres sì lo è probabilmente, ho visto anche io e sto chiedendo. Non c'erano lì esposizioni permanenti gli anni passati. Però lo segnalerò solo al prossimo turno ai giurati di rimuoverle, devo per scrupolo sentire il comune. Non ho tempo invece di segnalare ai giurati tutti questi casi critici, incluse chiese che non sono dei comuni e che l'ufficio di Milano non ha rimosso, e non ci son riuscito nemmeno io ancora perché faccio fede al comune fino a prova a contraria. In breve, io le sto appuntando e poi quando tutti voteranno le stesse foto, le segnalerò fra quelle rimaste. Comunque io ripulisco l'upload solo alla fine del processo di voto e ho tutte le informazioni chiare e più tempo di verificarle.--Alexmar983 (talk) 21:52, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Montage load errors[edit]

Hi Alex, I was just reviewing the Montage logs tonight and I noticed you were having some trouble getting files loaded. I just deployed what I believe should fix it, so feel free to give it another go. Note that this was an issue in rendering warnings about a few files that couldn't be loaded for other reasons:

file "File:Xxii_dinastia,_libro_dei_morti_di_penmaati,_xxii_dinastia.jpg" does not exist, please check that its name is spelled correctly, that it has not been renamed or removed
file "File:Vista_di_Stia.jpg" does not exist, please check that its name is spelled correctly, that it has not been renamed or removed
file "File:Vista_aerea_di_Villa_Ambrogiana.jpg" does not exist, please check that its name is spelled correctly, that it has not been renamed or removed
etc.

So we may want to debug deeper (formatting of the uploaded list is often an issue) and see what else is afoot. If unexpected issues persist, feel free to reach out via email or GitHub for more immediate attention, otherwise I'll be scanning the logs again tomorrow night. :) Thanks for your patience and hard work! --MahmoudHashemi (talk) 06:30, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

MahmoudHashemi I am fixing what there is to fix here and there (that was a text with an old empty campaign) but File:Vista aerea di Villa Ambrogiana.jpg and File:Vista di Stia.jpg they all exist actually.--Alexmar983 (talk) 10:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Agree, that part struck me as odd, too. This is in a recently-contributed part of the code (FOSS is great), so I'll have to take a little more time to understand what's happening. So far this is the only campaign seeing this, I wonder if it's something as simple as a File: prefix issue. Will dig deeper as time allows. --MahmoudHashemi (talk) 18:37, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:MahmoudHashemi I will keep making test, but I am mostly doing that job with a gallery, so I am covered. I am planning to try again with the import of a smaller list.--Alexmar983 (talk) 18:42, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

Dear Alexmar983,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

WMI[edit]

Ciao, ti rispondo qui per intenderci e per non andare OT nella pagina di discussione. Io non sono socio di WMI e probabilmente mai mi assocerò. Non condivido molte (se tutte) le scelte dell'associazione in termini di gestione di progetti, scelte del direttivo ed strategia a corto, medio e lungo termine. Di contro, collaboro quando trovo che lo scambio possa essere costruttivo e utile ai progetti Wikimedia (da lì la partecipazione come giurato a WML, anche perché di admin italiani su Commons pochi ce ne sono).

Più di una volta sono entrato in contatto col responsabile di WML per proporgli di integrare il sistema di autorizzazioni a OTRS o per almeno vagliarle prima, dato che - secondo me - il concorso era organizzato alla cazzo di cane e gestito ancora peggio. L'unica risposta che ho avuto è stata un "Si, vedremo". Il risultato è che le ultime edizioni sono state pessime (sia in qualità di contenuti che in termini organizzativi imho) e che ci troviamo davanti ad autorizzazioni evidentemente non accettabili su Commons. Se le cose non si possono fare bene, è meglio non farle, perché poi si fa perdere tempo agli admin (e agli utenti in genere), i quali hanno ben altro da fare che chiudere DR che avrebbero potuto essere evitate. Ruthven (msg) 13:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ruthven di admin it-N ce ne sono pochi perché di fondo le utenze italiane di lungo corso non hanno una cultura delle regole uguali per tutti ma del pensare che tutto si risolva "ad personam". Si potrebbe dibattere a lungo ma è già stato fatto off-wiki fra decine di utenze e sappiamo che non cambierà. Speriamo se ne assuma la resposabilità morale chi ha incoraggiato questo sistema, e chi indirettamente lo difende, ma non avverrà neanche questo.

Sta di fatto che quanto ho detto non riguarda essere o meno socio, ma attivarsi davvero dove serve a fare una differenza. Che sia gestito male è noto, ma è anche noto che chi viene pagato per farlo non ha alcun interesse a alzare lo standard, quindi forse andare dall'unica persona che gratis lo fa, ci perde ore, lo dice e si fa regolarmente trattre male e chiederle se "ha capito" non è una grande strategia, oltre a essere un vero e proprio off-topic (lo so che su itwikipedia non userebbe farlo notare e verrebbero cinque persone a dire che la colpa è a senso unico, ma appunto l'off-topic l'avrebbe creato quello). Ho dovuto iniziare io da solo a portare su commons le autorizzazioni e a rendere liberamente consultabile l'archivio, sono sempre io che deve farsi trattare male al telefono dallo sbucellone di turno che usa le pessime indicazioni di WMI per fare autorizzazioni sbagliate (chi si somiglia, si piglia), e così via. Una volta tanto si provasse a andare in pubblico a dire su queste piattaforme con quel tono a chi viene pagato per fare quel lavoro mediocremente e butta sabbia del motore in qualsiasi modo per evitare che lo standard aumenti. Quest'anno nonostante chiare indicazione di passare le autorizzazioni a me è stato fatto esattamente l'opposto. Morale della favole, roba inviata a fine giugno trascritta male a fine agosto senza dire nulla e tutto settembre passato a rifarne il più possibile per togliere chiese e interni di musei. Più di dieci mi pare ne ho duvute rifare. Così è ogni anno. Se prendessero i soldi per non fare nulla sarebbe meglio alle volte, almeno avrei e avremmo più tempo per far le cose meglio, ma non si sappia in giro che qualcuno fa meglio e gratis qualcosa.... anzi no andiamo in pubblico da quella persona a criticarla. Questo è la tua formazione itwikipedia, di fondo, e si vede. Non dovrebbe essere una sorpresa che ti ricordi che non serve a molto, ma sei libero da andare da qualcuno a farti dire il contrario.

Poi per carità si inventeranno che ciò che era bellissimo/bravissimo/competentissimo l'anno prima andrà di botto rifatto, basta che si paghi e alla fine non c'è problema, probabilmente sarà fatto comunque male perché standard non ce ne sono e non ce ne saranno. Quindi se le cose non si possono fare bene, è meglio non farle, perché poi si fa perdere tempo agli admin (e agli utenti in genere) è vero, ma vallo a dire in pubblico a chi davvero movimenta ore e ore di lavoro inutile e non a chi corre per correggerle e che quelle ore le perde già e ne farebbe volentieri a meno. Non è certo la peggiore delle autorizzazioni quella che vedi. Negli ultimi anni quasi ogni comunque sta infarcendo le liste di musei locali, da persona che passa ore a salvare il salvabile so benissimo che nessuno controlla niente. Comunque prova, va da chi viene pagato per farlo e esigi per non perdere tempo che dal prossimo anno come me telefoni a tutti i comuni e controlli tutti i musei, riscrivendo tutte le autroizzazioni in modo tale che siano il più possibile accurate. Tentar non nuoce, perché fermarsi a una regione che ha meno casi quando ne puoi fare 19 (escludendo la nostra) dove il controllo è fatto molto meno ? Non è ancora meno tempo perso? Fai l'azione dove massimizza il risultato. Hai detto tu stesso che in prvato non sortisce effetto, prova in pubblico. --Alexmar983 (talk) 19:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

categorie "books by" e "illustrations from"[edit]

ciao alex! long time no see, dopo secoli ho messo mano ai libri che ho caricato di neera e alle loro categorie e mi sono reso conto che c'è un bel marasma, non so chi (spero non io, secoli or sono) ha creato una categoria per ciascun libro che include djvu e illustrazioni, su esempio di altre pagine sto invece dividendo i file, ai djvu metto la categoria books by ma mi chiedevo che fare con quelle categorie già create vedi qui Category:Neera ho provato con "Voci della notte" trasformandolo in Illustration from... ma non so se è il percorso corretto. quando hai tempo fammi sapere :) thanks bye Divudi85 (talk) 17:38, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Divudi85 sì c'è un marasma e se ricordi quando portai il tema chiedendo o discutendo standard o migliorie la comunità itwikisource fu "freddina". Vidi poi che quando portava il tema altri c'era più reattività (della serie che nemmeno si ricordavano quando avevo posto il problema anni o mesi prima) quindi ho abbandonato quella "battaglia". Mi pare che qualche automazione fosse stata limata, ora se vuoi ti dò un'occhiata. Però non ho tempo prima di giovedì sicuramente...--Alexmar983 (talk) 06:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok il titolo è troppo generico, vedi come esempio c:Category:Illustrations from Angeli - Roma, parte I - Serie Italia Artistica, Bergamo, 1908. Devi mettere editore e anno. Altrimenti potrebbe essere qualsiasi edizione.--Alexmar983 (talk) 07:03, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

C:Category:Illustrations from Neera - Voci della notte, Napoli, Pierro, 1893 La mia proposta. Però tanto è solo basata su buon senso, chiunque potrebbe cambiarla ancora... ma se qua se si continua a "allevare" utenze che pensano al "caso per caso" e non al generale è normale che l'architettura faccia pena. Risolvere queste cose richiede visione di insieme, tempo, pazienza, discussione piene di troll, implementarle per avere massa critica... alla fine uno lo va a fare dove è più semplice. Io abbandonato Commons per investire di più su WIkidata anche per questo.--Alexmar983 (talk) 07:16, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

sad to hear that, pensavo ci fosse uno standard e che dovessi semplicemente impararlo. intanto grazie per la dritta sulle "illustrations"! Divudi85 (talk) 16:27, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

dimmi se ho capito bene Category:Neera -> Category:Books by Neera -> Category:Neera - Addio, Firenze, Paggi, 1897 -> Category:Illustrations from Neera - Addio, Firenze, Paggi, 1897 Divudi85 (talk) 17:23, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Divudi85 sì così lo farei io e mi pare diffuso ma non ho alcuna idea che sia lo standard in generale, non ho mai sentito discussioni su telegram sul tema (ma non lo seguo tanto) e avere una frammentazione linguistica aiuta poco sul fronte wikisource. Se c'è una comunità che ha riflettuto è quella in italiano, quindi dubito altri siano messi meglio. Fra anni andrà ripensato tutta l'architettura di scuro :) e magari noi dovremo cambiare solo una virgola ma pur sempre qualcosa.--Alexmar983 (talk) 18:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Question[edit]

Hi Alexmar983! I search somebody from Wikimedia Italy. I have some questions about monuments in Italy. Taking the pictures of monuments is prohibited? Why are there so few churches on the WLM lists? Can we do something about it? Maybe you know the answers to these questions or know where I can get these answers? Have a nice day! Tournasol7 (talk) 22:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User talk:Tournasol7 in Italy is not possible to just take an image of a monument and release it under a CC license. In theory, the owner should give you clear permission to do so, it's a law introduced in the early 2000s (Decreto Urbani) that clarifies the matter in the most rigid way. I sounds rigid but It was partially intended to avoid for example that iconic landmarks are used improperly in adverts, and to make the collective cultural heritage properly managed in the interest of the population, but it is written in a way that every minor item might be included. Our concept of "piece of "cultural heritage" according to our bureaucracy is so vague that it can be even a single stamp.

It's very rare with old monuments but it can happen that they challenge your image in a court and the Italian justice system is painfully slow we want to avoid people to deal with it. This goes beyond FOP. of course an image of an old artifact or building uploaded an a server abroad might not be affected but if you organize a public competition (such as WLM) you simply cannot violate the rule. So the image of a statue in a park or a facade of the old church can be on Commons, but NOT on WLM Italy.

Some owners are more rigid than others. Civil parishes usually "free" monuments, except some very big iconic ones. The Central State could, but it's the exception, private owners might give permission but they are usually unaware and it takes time to find them one by one, and the Catholic church is usually against it (some dioceses are locally more tolerant).

I have started to upload here just a fraction of the permissions collected so far in Tuscany (the 2021 form is also in English, you will see). I will complete it over the year..., WMI is not uploading them here on Commons (they should, but logistically they are a little bit late), but in Tuscany we started last year. We have a big archive to share, and this way they also be used as references on Wikidata (see the use of each file). As you can see, I tried to squeeze the most out of this complex legal situation... I also have half a dozens of useless permission where institutions signed the form but removed the part about granting the commercial reuse (among them: dicoese of Grosseto or the embassy of Brazil...) --Alexmar983 (talk) 23:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

categorie per gli editori pazzerelli dell'Ottocento[edit]

ciao alex, sto sistemando su wikidata work e edition per dei "blocchi" di libri che abbiamo su wikisource (vado a sentimento, a volte un autore, a volte editore...) dopo di ciò vengo qui e collego il file alll'item e sistemo le categorie, ho creato Books by Libreria editrice Galli ma questa casa ha avuto altre "istanze", è preceduta da Giuseppe Galli Libraio-editore e succeduta da Casa editrice Galli. Immagino di dover fare le categorie per ciascuna ma come le collego? speravo di scopiazzare dai Treves qui su commons c'è solo Fratelli Treves mentre su wikidata è un macello, references circolari, campi usati come descrizione... vabbè. hai qualche suggerimento? thanks --Divudi85 (talk) 20:03, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Divudi85 ho una lezione domani, va bene se guardo con calma nel WE?--Alexmar983 (talk) 20:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

nessuna fretta :) --Divudi85 (talk) 20:24, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Divudi85 mi ero totalmente dimenticato... mi ci metto nel WE giuro. Scusa, troppe cose da completare e levarsi di torno.--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:20, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

no worries, questo quello che ho fatto finora su commons poi mi sono spostato a tracciare le "dinastie" su wikidata. mi chiedo quale modello sia meglio usare sopratutto quando cambiano i nomi delle case editrici ma restano gli stessi editori. per esempio per bemporad ci sono le categorie legate ai due soggetti fisici Enrico Bemporad e Roberto Bemporad, come sottocategoria hanno Casa editrice R. Bemporad & figlio che a sua volta ha Books published by Casa editrice R. Bemporad & figlio. Quando si tratta di case più piccole però non so se regge, ho fatto una cosa simile per la Libreria Editrice Galli che però è preceduta dall'attività di Giuseppe Galli come persona/editore e seguita dalla denominazione Casa editrice Galli. Forse una soluzione sarebbe fare la categoria a Giuseppe Galli persona e dentro metterci books published by Giuseppe Galli editore, books published by Libreria editrice galli e books published by casa editrice galli? tentato una cosa del genere con Baldini & Castoldi visto che ha due denominazione estremamente simili... Le altre cose te le chiedo pian piano, non voglio sommergerti ora :) --Divudi85 (talk) 19:37, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PS su wikisource i collegamenti tra categorie sono fatti in maniera artigianale così, e a dir la verità non mi dispiace ho aggiunto qualche descrizione per palesare le relazioni... ovvio però che ogni piattaforma ha le sue regole... --Divudi85 (talk) 19:42, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Divudi85 allora io son sempre impegantissimo ma voglio seguire la cosa, solo che non è periodo per farla con l'attenzione che si merita... e quando dico che non ne ho, non scherzo. Intanto User:Epìdosis ha ripulito l'elemento che citavi all'inizio. Ci sentiamo più avanti.--Alexmar983 (talk) 19:56, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

no worries :) --Divudi85 (talk) 17:32, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photo challenge[edit]

Way back in 2016 you suggested fences as a theme for the photo challenge. No one commented on it, which is unusual as it is a fabulous theme. Fences are easy to photograph and are in every country. I think it would attract many photo submissions. Would you consider adding it again as a suggested theme, or I could as well. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:47, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magnolia677 I don't have time but do it and I will put a positive comment...--Alexmar983 (talk) 16:32, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magnolia677 sine there was no comment maybe you can simply copy and paste as it back in the proposal page...--Alexmar983 (talk) 16:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good idea. I'll message you when it's up. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lyon citoyen magazine 2008.jpg[edit]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Lyon citoyen magazine 2008.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 06:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User talk:A1Cafel that was a de minimis of a group image, if I recall correctly. They remain for years and than people randomly delete some of them here and there. The covers were in limited resolution ad one was not even an image, mostly consisting of a green background with some white line. So it's a group image, de minimis, mostly based on simple graphics and one partially cut image of limited resolution. The single topic has lost its intrinsic nature, it can be everyone of the issues (with a different cover) and the overall meaning will remain the same. The specific image is here not relevant at all. We are below the level of originality, because the concept is just the existence of the magazine and different issues of it,which per se is not copyrightable. The graphics ar not original, the phrases are short and the partially displayed work of the photographer is not relevant as well, in no way the author can prove that their specific creative work was crucial in creating the meaning of the final image. This was even more clear in another image that was deleted years ago where there were dozens of them. I remember I showed this one as well and nobody deleted it. Because this deletion are quite random.

So, it's fair to have them.. but at this point you will not agree and send me probably more links of generic concepts assuming I have not read them, but it still remains that such interpretation of derivative work is rigid and not effective in actually targeting the problems of derivative work related to real copyright issues (that is why it's a policy randomly applied after years.)

Have a nice day.--Alexmar983 (talk) 10:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re:Acquedotto di Colognole[edit]

Ciao, scusa il ritardo ma ultimamente ho poco tempo a disposizione da dedicare al progetto. Ho associazione le seguenti foto: - questo è il "bottino di riunione"; - questo è il cosiddetto "casotto ottagonale", che si trova in adiacenza alle varie "edicole" delle sorgenti. Non mi esprimo sulla geolocalizzazione, perché trovandosi all'interno del bosco non ho modo di verificare con esattezza. Comunque sono stati inseriti esclusivamente elementi relativi alle sorgenti; ci sono altre opere lungo il percorso, all'interno del territorio comunale di Collesalvetti, di cui non trovo alcuna menzione (tra le foto caricate, ad esempio le arcate e i casotti della "Castellaccia"). Resto a disposizione. Ciao --Etienne (Li) (talk) 17:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We need your feedback![edit]

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021[edit]

Quest’anno partecipi al concorso Wiki Loves Monuments?

Da domani sarà possibile caricare di nuovo le foto, fino al 30 settembre!

Come ogni anno, e questo è il decimo anniversario, torna Wiki Loves Monuments, il concorso fotografico più grande al mondo che negli anni ha coinvolto quasi 50 nazioni e più di 15.000 persone e hanno prodotto un database di oltre 360.000 immagini di monumenti, patrimonio culturale dell’umanità intera a disposizione di tutti su Wikimedia Commons.

Con la tua partecipazione hai sostenuto lo sviluppo turistico del nostro Paese perché rende disponibili a tutti le sue bellezze. L’obiettivo è la valorizzazione dell’immenso patrimonio culturale italiano sul web. Le fotografie dei monumenti vengono condivise su Wikimedia Commons, il grande database di immagini di Wikipedia, con licenza libera CC-BY-SA. Wiki Loves Monuments contribuisce infatti a diffondere la filosofia di Wikimedia Italia e di tutti i progetti wiki, che si basano sulla libera condivisione della cultura.

L’Italia nelle sue prime 9 edizioni (dal 2012 al 2020) conta 145.000 immagini 15.000 monumenti, 2.000 fotografi, 2.000 enti. Uno dei 2.000 fotografi sei tu e quindi anche quest’anno non puoi mancare, partecipa!!!

Ti aspettiamo. Questo messaggio ti è stato consegnato perché hai partecipato al concorso italiano nel 2020

Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 12:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine[edit]

Привіт!

З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже вдесяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року вперше будуть окремо виділені фото з повітря (дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо) — у спеціальній номінації «Аерофото». Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі.

Також вперше проводиться спеціальна номінація «Пам'ятки Подесення», знову пройдуть спецномінації «Відео», «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини», «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» та «Via Regia Ukraine». Для участі світлин у цих спецномінаціях не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Важливо! Цього року відбулася адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Однак, ми проводимо конкурс ще за попереднім адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Ми почали роботу над створенням списків з новим поділом, але вона ще не є завершена. Ви можете користуватися тими новими списками, що вже є, якщо потрібно відшукати пам'ятку за новим поділом (деякі ОДА вже почали присилати у такому форматі), але пам'ятайте, що нові списки ще не є повними.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».17:27, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

September 2021: it's Wiki Loves Monuments time again![edit]

Hi

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Ireland. We'd be delighted if you would enter again this year, and continue to build on the image archive of Ireland's built heritage.

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Ireland website. If you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. Once again, this year's contest runs until 30 September 2021.

Thanks again for your help and enthusiasm! Smirkybec (talk) 04:39, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Toscana è in corso[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

Gazie alla preparazione e al vostro impegno, WLM è un buon successo in regione anche per questa edizione. Siamo stabilmente secondi per caricamenti a livello nazionale: qui e qui si possono consultare alcune statistiche. Al momento risultano meno reattive le province di Prato e di Grosseto.

Fra i nuovi beni inseriti nelle liste segnaliamo da parte dei comuni sempre più ampliamenti rispetto alle nuove adesioni, mentre continuano ad aggiungersi sempre più beni privati. Tutte le liberatorie annunciate da quest'anno anche su Instagram sono da ritenersi verificate. Potrebbero arrivare comuni a fine mese al momento ancora in via di approvazione.

Per quanto riguarda le foto panoramiche, vengono inviate direttamente nelle categorie dei comuni e richiedono spesso la creazione di varie sottocategorie; per questo motivo vi preghiamo di non inviare troppe foto simili, dovendole in seguito smistare a mano.

La campagna sui tre canali sociali (per Facebook sia pagina che gruppo) prevede come nel 2020 una serie divulgativa con le foto delle edizioni precedenti in bianco e nero (caricate qui su Commons) alternata a una serie sulle foto migliori dell'edizione 2021, inframmezzate con più infografiche generali. Ogni giorno solo su Twitter e Facebook (gruppo ToscanaWiki) viene inoltre postata una foto fra quelle giunte prediligendo variabilità di luogo e tema.

Qui i volantini in più lingue.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it

Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2021 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2021 #WLM2021

Alexmar983 tramite -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні триває до 30 вересня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine is on till September 30[edit]

Автор фото Aeou, інфографіка AnastasiaPetrova (WMUA), CC BY-SA 4.0

Переможці спеціальної номінації «Відео» 2020. Автори роликів: Ігор Мартинів, Кирило Венцеславський; Музика: Erik Satie: Gymnopedie No 2 by Kevin MacLeod. Монтаж: Atoly. Ліцензія CC BY-SA 4.0

Привіт!

Нагадуємо, що до 30 вересня включно можна вантажити світлини та відео культурної спадщини України до національного етапу міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»!

Зараз Україна посідає 3-є місце за кількістю завантажених світлин, поступаючись Російській Федерації та Німеччині. За першу половину місяця було завантажено світлини пам'яток із усіх регіонів України, але частина із них є дуже погано представлена. Севастополь зараз представлений тільки однією пам'яткою і одним фото, Крим — 12 пам'яток і 51 фото. Детальніше — у таблиці:

Проміжна статистика
Регіон	К-ть пам'яток	К-ть фото
Севастополь	1	1
АР Крим	12	51
Закарпаття	26	96
Миколаївщина	29	81
Рівненщина	36	186
Херсонщина	36	83
Житомирщина	55	324
Донеччина	57	153
Тернопільщина	62	234
Буковина	75	220
Луганщина	82	90
Львівщина	82	351
Кіровоградщина	88	181
Волинь	98	270
Одещина	115	383
Сумщина	129	414
Дніпропетровщина	139	278
Київ	159	248
Хмельниччина	166	538
Полтавщина	171	594
Харківщина	175	625
Київщина	181	651
Черкащина	186	455
Прикарпаття	240	305
Вінничина	242	775
Запоріжжя	253	317
Чернігівщина	305	519

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Цього року у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій:

«Аерофото» — для фото з повітря (зроблені дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо). Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі;
«Відео» — для відеосюжетів з пам'ятками;
«Єврейська спадщина» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Млини» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Пам'ятки Подесення» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Via Regia Ukraine» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом 15 населених пунктів, що за цим маршрутом є.

Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Приєднуйтеся!

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:06, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Toscana sta per finire[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

Fra poco si chiuderà l'edizione 2021 di Wiki Loves Monuments.

Ci teniamo a segnalare a chi avesse scorso le liste in precedenza, che negli ultimi giorni sono stati concessi a tempo indefinito nuovi beni da fotografare a Pontremoli, Volterra e San Giovanni Valdarno.

Se hai delle foto di archivio da condividere, il bottone blu di caricamento su ogni riga in tabella sarà attivo fino alla mezzanotte di oggi.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it

Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2021 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2021 #WLM2021

Alexmar983 tramite -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:2018-09-14 Terme Excelsior Interno finestre.jpg

And also:

File:2018-09-14 Terme Excelsior Interno soffitto.jpg

Yours sincerely, SCP-2000 10:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Divulgo Wiki Loves Toscana 07 Scultura Prato.pdf

Yours sincerely, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:16, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started[edit]

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--15:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

manual entry[edit]

Hi. To manually enter a photo (which wasn't uploaded through the campaign) to the Wiki Science Competition, does one just add {{Wiki Science Competition 2021|us}}? Or is something else required? Thanks. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:25, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Rhododendrites that is enough. it automatically inserts the national category. You could also simply insert the category manually, without template, but the template it's more elegant and standardized. Some users sometimes make a mess with the category tree (putting a non-year specific category), so I would generally go with the insertion of the template.--Alexmar983 (talk) 03:57, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you Alexmar983 – Frissonneherissonne884 🔔 01:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Долучіться до опитування — допоможіть визначити, як проводити конкурс «Вікі любить пам’ятки» у 2022 році[edit]

Вітаємо! Ви отримуєте це повідомлення, бо брали участь в українській частині міжнародного конкурсу «Вікі любить пам’ятки» у минулі роки. Зараз організаційна команда конкурсу вирішує, як проводити його під час повномасштабної війни в Україні.

Ми розуміємо, що цього року ми не зможемо провести конкурс у звичному форматі — зокрема тому, що фотографування об'єктів в Україні зараз ускладнене міркуваннями безпеки. Однак наша місія із документування української культурної спадщини є як ніколи важливою, тому розглядаємо варіанти, як можна провести конкурс у обмеженому форматі.

Для цього хочемо запитати поради у спільноти конкурсу. Просимо приділити 5—7 хвилин (не пізніше середи, 6 липня), щоби висловити свою думку.

Пройдіть опитування за посиланням

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 17:23, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you Alexmar983 – Frissonneherissonne884 🔔 04:00, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2022 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Ukraine[edit]

Привіт!

Цього року українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки» пройде з 1 по 31 жовтня — через російське вторгнення в Україну також довелося змінити умови: тільки світлини зроблені до 23 лютого 2022 року включно будуть прийматися в основній частині конкурсу.

В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже водинадцяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року знову пройде спецномінація «Відео» — для участі робіт у цій спецномінації не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — роботи зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Важливо! Цього року ми проводимо конкурс вже за чинним адміністративно-територіальним устроєм.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 20:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

5 днів Вікі любить пам'ятки 2022 в Україні / 5 days of Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Ukraine[edit]

Привіт!

Українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки» вже почалася — за 5 днів фотозмагання Україна вийшла на 12-е місце за кількістю світлин у світі. Не кількістю єдиною, звісно, але гарно було б не надто сильно відстати від російської частини конкурсу, і хоча б потрапити до почесних топ-5.

Цього року вперше у конкурсі є спеціальна номінація «Фотоплівка» — на неї можна подавати скани світлин, зроблених на фотоплівці — мова може йти й про скани самої фотоплівки і скани з віддрукованих знімків із неї. Ця спецномінація покликана мотивувати оцифровувати й ділитися своїми фотоархівами: частина об'єктів уже виглядає дуже відмінно, а частина — більше не існує… Враховуючи сучасну ситуацію із російським вторгненням і можливість потенційної втрати таких фотоархівів, ця спецномінація — актуальна. Врахуйте, що для того, щоб світлина потрапила на спецномінацію, потрібно вибрати відповідне поле у Завантажувачі.

Автори світлин маловідомих пам'яток України зможуть позмагатися за відзнаку від «Україна Інкогніта».

Також уже традиційно пройде спецномінація «Відео» — для участі робіт у цій спецномінації не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — роботи зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук. У нас також є сторінка в інстаграмі та твіттері.

Важливо! Цього року ми проводимо конкурс вже за чинним адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Приймаються тільки ті світлини та відео, які були зняті до 23 лютого 2022 року включно.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:31, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікі любить пам'ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

File:Alex Haley Annapolis.JPG[edit]

File:Alex Haley Annapolis.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Magnolia677 (talk) 16:35, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ще 3 дні! Вікі любить пам'ятки 2022 в Україні триває до 31 жовтня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Ukraine[edit]

Привіт! Сподіваємося, що ви та ваша родина у безпеці. Нагадуємо, що залишилося три дні до завершення конкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», і якщо у вас є можливість взяти участь у конкурсі цього року — долучайтеся!

Трохи статистики за результатами чотирьох тижнів конкурсу:

завантажено понад 11000 світлин, які зображують майже 3700 об’єктів культурної спадщини;
- з них фотографії 180 пам'яток — вперше подані на конкурс;
понад 500 світлин подано у спецномінації «Фотоплівка»;
вже більше 220 учасників та учасниць;
- з них більше 130 — зареєструвалися вже під час конкурсу.

Найменш представлені регіони — Севастополь (1 фото), Донецька (19), Миколаївська (20), Кіровоградська (58), Крим (72), Херсонська (74) та Луганська (80). Конкурсні списки за регіонами можна переглянути тут: списки пам'яток.

Переглядайте свої фото- та відеоархіви й приєднуйтеся!

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 08:07, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікі любить пам'ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

Grazie per aver partecipato a WLM Italia 2022[edit]

Grazie per aver contribuito con le tue fotografie all'edizione 2022 di Wiki Loves Monuments. La pregiuria ha selezionato le foto finaliste tra cui saranno scelti i vincitori: Castelli, Monumenti. La cerimonia di premiazione si terrà sabato 3 dicembre a Formigine: se sei interessato a partecipare segui gli aggiornamenti sulla pagina dell'evento.--Ysogo (talk) 17:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC) Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)Reply[reply]

Thank you for having contributed with your pictures to the 2022 edition of Wiki Loves Monuments - Italy. The prejury has selected the finalist pictures among which the winners will be chosen: Fortifications, Tradional contest. The awards ceremony will be hold in Formigine on Saturday December 3rd: if you are keen to join, follow the updates on the page of the event.--Ysogo (talk) 17:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC) This message has been delivered through Global message delivery system)Reply[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Toscana[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

L'edizione 2022 di Wiki Loves Monuments ha concluso giorni fa il suo processo selettivo.

Quest'anno non abbiamo segnalato in corso d'opera perché abbiamo avuto delle metriche di adesione molto più alte rispetto agli ultimi anni, quindi incentivare il caricamento sarebbe stato controproducente per i partecipanti più occasionali. Probabilmente il prossimo anno ci sarà un calo fisiologico, e conviene pertanto preparare i vostri scatti per il 2023.

I semifinalisti, come ogni edizione, sono invitati alla cerimonia di premiazione che quest'anno si terrà nel tardo pomeriggio di sabato 28 gennaio p.v. a Montespertoli (FI) presso il Museo della Vite e del Vino.

Qui i risultati finali, che saranno annunciati a breve sui canali sociali. Seguite quelli per ulteriori aggiornamenti.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it