User talk:Animalparty

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Animalparty!

Digital commonwealth and other GLAM files to Commons upload tool(s)[edit]

- [1]

Is there a way to mass upload files (such as the one you uploaded above) from digitalcommonwealth.org or other similar websites. I have used the flickr to commons tool. Is there a similar tool for GLAM websites?

Thank you, --Ooligan (talk) 20:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ooligan: Aside from Flickr2Commons I'm not very handy with mass uploading. Commons:GLAMwiki Toolset and Commons:Pattypan might prove helpful. You can also propose bot assisted mass uploads at Commons:Batch uploading, where the community can evaluate feasibility and determine some best practices (e.g. which template and license to use, how best to transfer metadata, etc.) before implementation. And lastly, anecdotally, it appears that the Boston Public Library Flickr stream adds a needless, more restrictive CC license to public domain media (e.g. here), even though they state "no known copyright restrictions," in what resembles Copyfraud. Requiring attribution, and/or a link to a CC license, is not a requirement for faithful scans of public domain images, especially in the US where "sweat of the brow" doctrine doesn't confer any additional copyright authorship to the person scanning or uploading a work (see {{PD-Scan}} and Commons:Threshold of originality). Cheers, --Animalparty (talk) 22:17, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you for the reply.
In "faithful scans of public domain images"- Is a download or screenshot on a PC of a PD-expired image a faithful scan? Or do I need to do I need to use scanner equipment?
Also, can I take a photo of an original PD photo and release for use it as PD? Similarly, Can I take a photo of a PD-expired photo that has been published in a book and release it as PD?
Thanks, --Ooligan (talk) 00:43, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Downloads and screenshots would be faithful replicas, yes, although screenshots are typically of lowered resolution and thus non-optimal (as would photos of photos). Attribution, while not required, is helpful in tracking provenance. DS (talk) 19:53, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Methodologies[edit]

Wanted to be sure you were aware of the methodology described here, which you may find useful. DS (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:56, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hi!!![edit]

just want to say hi!!!! BoulevardBowl27 (talk) 16:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. The EN article Kae Miller is up for Good Article nomination, and the reviewer is waiting on two images that I uploaded to be reviewed. I'm a fellow License reviewer, but obviously can't review images I uploaded myself. Would you be so good as to stamp, and thereby confirm that

are properly licensed at https://www.maxrashbrooke.net/the-good-society/kae-miller ? Max Rashbrooke is an author and her grandson. https://www.maxrashbrooke.net/more-about-me Thank you! --GRuban (talk) 19:08, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done by another License reviewer. --GRuban (talk) 20:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]