User talk:Yann

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Getty Flickr CC Undeletions

Hey Yann, back in 2019, you restored a bunch of images that were tagged CC on Flickr but wrongly deleted because of Getty metadata. Can you also undelete these ones as well? Thanks.

Opencooper (talk) 21:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Opencooper:

Done for the first 3, but the last one is a different case, + the file was removed on Flickr, + the account didn't exist anymore on Flickr. Yann (talk) 21:38, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yeah, the last one wasn't for TechCrunch, but found it while looking at the user's deletion noms around that period, so thought I might as well include it. Thanks! Opencooper (talk) 04:05, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:Earth Views from the International Space Station.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your revert of my complain

Hey Yann,

in response to your warning: You've warned me, that I should not modify a DR after the decision. But reason for my edit was not the decision or the DR itself, but the personal attack posted against me by the user Xunks.

Am I not allowed to complain about comments which the Code Of Conducts lists as "Unacceptable behavior" on the page on which they've been made?

If so, please provide guidance how otherwise communicate with the user in question, as you also reverted my comment on his talk page.

--RubenKelevra (talk) 21:05, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@RubenKelevra: The DR is the wrong place to complain, specially if the complain is about someone's behaviour. Complains should be posted to COM:ANU. But IMHO the DR was closed according to Commons and copyright law. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Yann: I really don't care about the DR process: My comment was ignored and my word that the source - which was the same as the other files source - showed it as PD seems to count nothing as well. At the time of the complaint the source was no longer available due to political reasons. So I could not provide any further evidence, despite me trying for a couple of hours to locate something.

So if that's your opinion on that matter, I won't even try to argue with you on that.

What matters for me is that my name is no longer associated with deflations in form of personal attacks:

On my talk page Xunks posted a template which make it appear that I made "personal attacks and disruptive comments", the text continues to threatens me of "actions" if I'm continue to be not "civil", and asks me to "keep a cool head".

No idea in which this text is regarded useful, but I did nothing what the text claims.

Sure I was frustrated, that my work is handled differently than basically a different picture from the same stack of images published. But I did not attack anyone personally nor was my comment not civil.

The only thing I did was to call the idea to find something substantial regarding the PD status of these pictures laughable, as I just tired for hours.

The reason to post on this DR was *not* to alter the decision, but at least do a DR for the other images as well. They are either all PD or all of them are not.

I also wanted to not let that personal attack of calling me "arrogant", "personal attacking", "adding disruptive comments", not "civil", and not having a "cool head" while also threatening me with "actions" against my account stand there and on my talk page.I

I just want to discuss the personal attack with the user, to make him stop and have him revert his accusations. Which are publicly available for everyone to read - and I don't seems to have even the right to add a response this page, calling it out as false accusations.

So what are my other options here? Can I add a comment to his talk page, or would this be deleted again? RubenKelevra (talk) 22:35, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In one point, I think similarly like RubenKelevra. Either all files with the same or similar content are wrong or none are wrong, if it's just the one file that gets tagged but the other with the same or very similar content of someone else is not tagged, it is selective treatment and this leads to frustration and lengthy edits. I was about to make another lengthy edit but now refrain. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:45, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Chaya geet.png

This looks like a netcopyvio with a rather obvious watermark from a website. Is the logo above the ToO in India? Abzeronow (talk) 19:45, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done Deleted. Yann (talk) 21:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Violazioni di copyright

Ciao Yann, scusa non volevo fare qualcosa di sbagliato per la comunità, credevo che le foto fosse caricabili, soprattutto l'ultima che avevo provato a rimettere solo dopo averla caricata sul sito Flickr e specificando che era libera da diritti. Ma sicuramente devo, involontariamente, aver fatto qualcosa di sbagliato. Ora chiederò direttamente al titolare del sito Giuseppe Ferlito di scrivere nel sito stesso che le foto sono con licenza libera per cosi non violare il copyright. Per caso sai aiutarmi e dirmi correttamente cosa devo far scrivere per non commettere ulteriori errori? Grazie e scusami per gli errori in buona fede commessi. --Valentina Tretti (talk) 17:39, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ciao Yann, la foto in questione è pubblicata in maniera libera da qualsiasi diritto su Flickr, https://www.flickr.com/photos/197701059@N02/52691584810/in/photolist-2ohb9qb risulta infatti di dominio pubblico. Se cortesemente mi spieghi dove sto sbagliando tento di risolvere il problema. Grazie --Valentina Tretti (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Valentina Tretti: Don't do that again, and please read COM:LL. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright issue I found

Hey Yann, I hope you don't mind me posting this here for your attention, but we've interacted before both here and on enwiki and you seem both knowledgeable and skilled at navigating commons. While browsing around articles I was surprised to see the Cascadian flag hosted on commons at File:Flag of Cascadia.svg. It's expressly noted on the page that it's not under a free license and that any use requires the express consent of the flags creator, which is true. It's been up since 2007 and there's going to be extensive collateral damage, it's used all over the place on wikis of every language. I'm not sure how it's gone so long without being noticed. I wanted to pass this along to someone much more equipped then I to handle it. Apologies for dumping it on you. --127(point)0(point)0(point)1 (talk) 18:19, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:CONGRESS 1942.jpg

This matches a photograph from Alamy https://www.alamy.com/stock-image-mohandas-gandhi-1869-1948-was-driven-to-gowalia-tank-maidan-mumbai-165991589.html?irclickid=VZMUVSW75xyNWl5V3Sz9P1sNUkAyir3xRTJg3w0&utm_source=77643&utm_campaign=Shop%20Royalty%20Free%20at%20Alamy&utm_medium=impact&irgwc=1 but a 1942 photograph would be public domain in India. I wonder if this is a dupe of something we already have. If it's not a dupe, I'll fix the description and licensing later. Abzeronow (talk) 19:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Abzeronow: Thanks for checking this. I don't remember seeing this on Commons. Seeing the low quality and small resolution, it may be better to delete it in favour of a better copy, if possible. Yann (talk) 19:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I also found a copy at Bridgeman as well. https://www.bridgemanimages.com/en-US/noartistknown/mohandas-gandhi-was-driven-to-gowalia-tank-maidan-1940/nomedium/asset/3507932 Abzeronow (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Abzeronow: Ah this is good, as it makes it free of URAA copyright issue. Yann (talk) 20:30, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Abzeronow: Actually, the picture is from August 1942. I uploaded a better version, and fixed the license and the description. Yann (talk) 10:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Smoke from the 2023 Ohio train derailment taken during the night, February 3.jpg

Could i convince you to review my file? Please Trade (talk) 21:03, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done already. Yann (talk) 21:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Asking for the second and last time --Trade (talk) 04:29, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 10:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ce soir, -paris s'est mobilisée lors de -EarthHour en éteignant -LaTourEiffel -Cities4Climate (25913677225).jpg

The license to this file was changed in August 2022 to "all rights reserved" after it was kept by you in a DR. I had followed the guidance on license review but I don't know the policy on files like this where you can see the license history. @A1Cafel: Abzeronow (talk) 21:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

By good luck, the free license could be tracked in Internet Archive. License reviewed. Yann (talk) 21:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK thanks. I guess I'll check for Wayback Machine links the next time something like this comes up. Abzeronow (talk) 22:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Abzeronow: Also the Flickr now has a function of License History, which can check whether a file has a license change or not. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:24, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:NEO•GEO CD Logo.png

Hello. Is it possible to reactivate this image?

This is Neo Geo CD’s(SNK Corporation's video game console) logo. All the same SNK's console logos are registered in Wikicommons.

•Neo Geo…File:Neo_Geo_logo.png

•Hyper Neo Geo 64…File:Logo_of_Hyper_Neo_Geo_64.png

•Neo Geo Pocket…File:SNK_NeoGeo_Pocket_logo.png

•Neo Geo Pocket Color…File:Neo_Geo_Pocket_Color_logo.svg

but only the Neo Geo CD’s logo disabled on Wikicommons. Please reactivate this image.

(Sorry, I use google translate system.) Le pierrot triste (talk) 06:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Le pierrot triste: The formal written permission from the copyright holder for a free license is needed. If you have such a permission, please see COM:VRT for the procedure. File:Neo_Geo_logo.png is complex enough to have a copyright. Also do not use special characters (such as •) for file names. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]